<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wisdump &#187; WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/category/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on design and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:35:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Show Your Reliability With Weekly Returning Offerings</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/wisdump/show-your-reliability-with-weekly-returning-offerings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/wisdump/show-your-reliability-with-weekly-returning-offerings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/wisdump/show-your-reliability-with-weekly-returning-offerings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen is great. If you&#8217;re the least interested in the WordPress community you know this. She&#8217;s got a great blog, she is a great interview subject, and she does a great job giving us the weekly WordPress recap over at The Blog Herald. The latest one went online yesterday. Other blogs should learn from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorelle VanFossen is great. If you&#8217;re the least interested in the WordPress community you know this. She&#8217;s got <a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/">a great blog</a>, she is <a href="http://bloggertalks.com/2008/02/the-lorelle-story-an-interview-with-lorelle-vanfossen/">a great interview subject</a>, and she does a great job giving us the weekly WordPress recap over at The Blog Herald. <a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/19/wordpress-wednesday-news-sneak-peeks-of-wordpress-25-beta-released-wordcamp-dallas-next-week-and-more-wordpress-news/">The latest one</a> went online yesterday.</p>
<p>Other blogs should learn from Lorelle, and The Blog Herald, in regards to the WordPress Wednesday News segment. <strong>By having a returning column on a given day you&#8217;re signaling reliability,</strong> and that&#8217;s certainly a good thing, especially online, where sites and blogs come and go.</p>
<p>Something to think about for your blog, surely.</p>
<p>With that I bid you a happy Easter. I&#8217;ll be back on Tuesday next week. Another thing slated for next week is <a href="/design/wisdump-redesign-ive-decided-finally/">the new Wisdump design</a>, in public beta. How about that, huh?</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tg-TwaxTPSs&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tg-TwaxTPSs&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/wisdump/show-your-reliability-with-weekly-returning-offerings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Next WordPress Default Theme Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/wordpress/the-next-wordpress-default-theme-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/wordpress/the-next-wordpress-default-theme-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog template]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premium themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sandbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/wordpress/the-next-wordpress-default-theme-contest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ThemeShaper is hosting a contest for the next default theme for WordPress, since Ian thinks Kubrick&#8217;s gone old (I agree). He&#8217;s proposing The Sandbox since it&#8217;s easily modified, but it looks like crap so a new default design is still needed. Weigh in, and win premium themes!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://themeshaper.com/the-next-wordpress-default-theme/">ThemeShaper is hosting a contest</a> for the next default theme for WordPress, since Ian thinks Kubrick&#8217;s gone old (<a href="/design/designers-the-rounded-corners-are-holding-you-back/">I agree</a>). He&#8217;s proposing <a href="http://www.plaintxt.org/themes/sandbox/">The Sandbox</a> since it&#8217;s easily modified, but it looks like crap so a new default design is still needed.</p>
<p><a href="http://themeshaper.com/the-next-wordpress-default-theme/">Weigh in, and win premium themes!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/wordpress/the-next-wordpress-default-theme-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premium Admin Themes The Next Big Thing?</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/premium-admin-themes-the-next-big-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/design/premium-admin-themes-the-next-big-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admin themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premium themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress 2.5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design/premium-admin-themes-the-next-big-thing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upcoming WordPress 2.5 is delayed, which I saw coming, and that&#8217;s fine. I&#8217;d rather have a working release, than a buggy one, and I&#8217;m sure most of us agree. One of the new features in 2.5 is a revamped admin look, something that won&#8217;t sit well with every user of course. Not that today&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upcoming WordPress 2.5 <a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/03/12/wordpress-wednesday-news-wordpress-25-due-march-17-administration-plugins-may-break-tons-of-plugins-updated-add-buttons-to-toolbar-wordpress-dallas-and-now-milan/">is delayed</a>, which <a href="http://tdhedengren.com/publishing/wordpress-25-due-yesterday/">I saw coming</a>, and that&#8217;s fine. I&#8217;d rather have a working release, than a buggy one, and I&#8217;m sure most of us agree.</p>
<p>One of the new features in 2.5 is <a href="http://planetozh.com/blog/2008/02/wordpress-25-preview-the-admin-area/">a revamped admin look</a>, something that won&#8217;t sit well with every user of course. Not that today&#8217;s theme is perfect in any way, but change always makes users react, which is why there are some admin themes available. </p>
<p><span id="more-690"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingpro.com/archives/2008/03/12/wordpress-25-administration-theme-fluency/">BloggingPro points out</a> that 2.5 users will be able to get a cleaner admin look with <a href="http://www.deanjrobinson.com/projects/fluency-admin/">the Fluency admin theme</a>, looking a lot more sober than the new admin for sure.</p>
<p><img src="http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/videogaming247-register.jpg" alt="videogaming247-register.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="233" style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #aaa;" />That got me thinking. WordPress blogs are being used for more and more things, as is other blog platforms for that matter. Sometimes these new ways of using the platform means that you&#8217;ll want user to register and edit their details, which sends them into the one part of your site that isn&#8217;t controlled by your theme: The admin.</p>
<p>For instance, <a href="http://www.videogaming247.com/">videogaming247</a> is forcing me to <a href="http://www.videogaming247.com/wp-login.php?action=register">register</a>, and while the login form and such are tailored, the actual admin isn&#8217;t, which is a hideous break to the actual site design.</p>
<p>Some screenshots below. The customized register box (login box is similar) to the right is the one they&#8217;re using, which fits the style well enough I&#8217;d say.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/videogaming247.jpg" alt="videogaming247.jpg" border="0" width="450" height="370" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><small><em>Above:</em> The website &bull; <em>Below:</em> Logged in</small></p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/videogaming247-loggedin.jpg" alt="videogaming247-loggedin.jpg" border="0" width="450" height="370" /></div>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to let users register, <strong>style the admin to fit your site&#8217;s design!</strong> Common sense.</p>
<p>Does that mean that we&#8217;ll see premium admin themes released in the near future? Perhaps as addons to premium theme releases? What do you think?</p>
<p>And I said it first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/design/premium-admin-themes-the-next-big-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Blogs, Thoughts on the Technical Aspects</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/wordpress/multiple-blogs-thoughs-on-the-technical-aspects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/wordpress/multiple-blogs-thoughs-on-the-technical-aspects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog Network Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devlounge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakten.se]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress MU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/wordpress/multiple-blogs-thoughs-on-the-technical-aspects/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#8217;ve decided to run multiple blogs after all. Good for you, as long as you&#8217;re contributing (or making a truckload of cash) then it&#8217;s fine. Or why not just hire someone to blog for you, that always works, right? Time to install 35 WordPress blogs! Even if that 5 minute install was all that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/multitool.jpg' alt='Multiple choices' style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;" />So you&#8217;ve <a href="/blogging/multiple-blogs-or-power-houses/">decided to run multiple blogs</a> after all. Good for you, as long as you&#8217;re contributing (or making a truckload of cash) then it&#8217;s fine. Or why not just <a href="http://bloggerjobs.biz/">hire someone</a> to blog for you, that always works, right?</p>
<p>Time to install 35 WordPress blogs! Even if that 5 minute install was all that was needed, it would be around 3 hours of work, and that&#8217;s not counting setting up your databases, uploading WordPress files, and so on. Then you&#8217;ve got your average plugins, API keys to paste into Akismet&#8217;s settings, activating the right theme, fixing the permalinks&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-604"></span>Yes, I know. <strong>Who launches 35 blogs at once?</strong> No one of course, but you get the picture. Every blog takes some time to setup.</p>
<p>You can do all that just once, and then launch a new (basic) blog in a matter of seconds, with <a href="http://mu.wordpress.org">WordPress MU</a>. It&#8217;s pretty easy too, as long as you use one domain for your blogging enterprises. Then again I&#8217;m sure there are hacks for multiple domains out there&#8230;</p>
<p>I recently used WordPress MU in a Swedish blog networkish project, called <a href="http://pakten.se">pakten.se</a>. Check it out if you like, it&#8217;s in Swedish though, and the front page isn&#8217;t done (links in the top bar to dig deeper). That was an experience.</p>
<p>Which brings me to the point of this post. You really should investigate solutions <strong>to make things easier on yourself</strong> if you&#8217;re managing multiple blogs. WordPress MU might be one solution, but chances are you&#8217;ve got a bunch of domains and don&#8217;t want to hack around too much. There are other options though, like subversion, but that&#8217;s not exactly my expertise.</p>
<p><strong>You need a technical strategy for managing multiple blogs</strong>. Sure, you can just update them all when a new point release is out, but that takes a lot of time. It might be the best solution for you, but make sure you&#8217;ve got your strategy clear to you from the beginning, otherwise you&#8217;ll have a hard time along the road.</p>
<p>After all, while you might not launch with 35 blogs, you might end up having the administrative responsibility of that number, or more. Updating them all is a bother to say the least.</p>
<p>Do you run multiple blogs, and <strong>do you have a technical strategy for how to handle them?</strong> My guess is no, most of us probably bites the bullet and take it as it comes. Even though it&#8217;s a bother every time we need to update, right?</p>
<p>I can tell you this though. Having WordPress MU to power my Swedish blog network, seven blogs strong at the moment, is a breeze, although the way there wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s another story, and <a href="http://www.devlounge.net/articles/using-wordpress-mu-to-power-multiple-blogs">it&#8217;s available over at Devlounge</a>, so check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/wordpress/multiple-blogs-thoughs-on-the-technical-aspects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you committed to WordPress? Then how do you feel about Automattic?</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/business/are-you-committed-to-wordpress-then-how-do-you-feel-about-automattic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/business/are-you-committed-to-wordpress-then-how-do-you-feel-about-automattic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/business/are-you-committed-to-wordpress-then-how-do-you-feel-about-automattic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to TechCrunch, there&#8217;s rumors that the Automattic founders will make a bunch of money from the investors in the company, in response to the turned down $200m buyout offer. Good for Matt &#038; Co. of course, I won&#8217;t begrudge anyone making money out of good products such as WordPress.com and Akismet. However, Automattic also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/automatticownzwp.jpg' alt='Automattic ownz WordPress - Is that OK?' style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;" /><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/automattic-founders-to-take-big-money-off-the-table/">According to TechCrunch</a>, there&#8217;s rumors that the <a href="http://automattic.com">Automattic</a> founders will make a bunch of money from the investors in the company, in response to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/">the turned down $200m buyout offer</a>. Good for <a href="http://photomatt.com">Matt</a> &#038; Co. of course, I won&#8217;t begrudge anyone making money out of good products such as <a href="http://wordpress.com">WordPress.com</a> and <a href="http://akismet.com">Akismet</a>.</p>
<p>However, Automattic also controls <a href="http://wordpress.org">the opensource self-hosted version of WordPress</a>, <strong>and that raises some questions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Are you comfortable with a company being the driving force behind the opensource platform you&#8217;re committed to?</li>
<li>What would happen to WordPress if someone bought Automattic?</li>
<li>Are all decisions being made for opensource WordPress with it&#8217;s best at heart, or does the company&#8217;s best come first?</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong here, I&#8217;m a big WordPress fan, <strong>and Automattic have so far not done anything to piss me off.</strong> In fact, I think they&#8217;re doing a pretty good job, despite the whole sponsor links debacle, and the unfriendly designer credits talked about in the WordPress.com Theme Marketplace idea. And Akismet is great, free, and everything, so I&#8217;m committed to WordPress myself.</p>
<p>However, having a company running an opensource platform is scary stuff. <strong>How do you feel about this?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/business/are-you-committed-to-wordpress-then-how-do-you-feel-about-automattic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designers: How do you value your name in the footer?</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/designers-how-do-you-value-your-name-in-the-footer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/design/designers-how-do-you-value-your-name-in-the-footer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design/designers-how-do-you-value-your-name-in-the-footer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent revelation that Automattic wouldn&#8217;t allow designer&#8217;s names in the footer on themes sold on the upcoming WordPress.com Theme Marketplace &#8211; which I blogged about recently &#8211; got me thinking. For me, it&#8217;s crucial that my name is visually exposed on the sites I design. These are the guarantees of gigs delivered, and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/footercredits.jpg' alt='Credits, credits' style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 3px;" />The recent revelation <a href="http://photomatt.net/2007/11/01/wpcom-marketplace-idea/#comment-430158">that Automattic wouldn&#8217;t allow designer&#8217;s names in the footer</a> on themes sold on the upcoming <a href="http://photomatt.net/2007/11/01/wpcom-marketplace-idea/">WordPress.com Theme Marketplace</a> &#8211; which I <a href="/design/wordpresscom-to-offer-theme-marketplace-and-why-ill-be-on-it/">blogged about recently</a> &#8211; got me thinking. For me, it&#8217;s crucial that my name is visually exposed on the sites I design. These are the guarantees of gigs delivered, and a way for gaining recognition. Aside from pure recommendations, I know I&#8217;ve gained a few clients this way, and would probably gain more if I had the time, and put up a serious portfolio.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t care about building pagerank with these design credits in the footer, but I could understand people wanting to do that as well. If a client requested a <em>nofollow</em> on my design credit I&#8217;d probably think he was a bit cheap, but fine, I&#8217;d probably be OK with it. Unless I took a principal stand for some reason&#8230; Anyway, the point is, I&#8217;m not putting those links in there to build Google juice, I have them there to prove that I did the design, and to possibly gain new clients.</p>
<p><span id="more-551"></span><a href="/design/wordpresscom-to-offer-theme-marketplace-and-why-ill-be-on-it/">In the post about the WordPress.com Theme Marketplace</a>, I said that I would probably be on it, even though Automattic is claiming 50% of my revenue. <strong>That opinion will be seriously considered if I won&#8217;t get my name in my theme&#8217;s footer, linked to my site.</strong> A <em>nofollow</em> is OK, but just giving me credit in the metadata, that Matt&#8217;s talking about, isn&#8217;t an option for me.</p>
<p>I doubt any of my clients gained with online recognition (and that includes blog posts where my services are namedropped) would even think of looking for the designer&#8217;s name in the metadata, and some would probably not even be aware of the fact that there is such a thing as metadata, let alone know how to find it!</p>
<p><strong>How do you value your link in the footer on designs you&#8217;ve sold, or released for free for that matter?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/design/designers-how-do-you-value-your-name-in-the-footer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress.com to offer Theme Marketplace, and why I&#8217;ll be on it</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/wordpresscom-to-offer-theme-marketplace-and-why-ill-be-on-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/design/wordpresscom-to-offer-theme-marketplace-and-why-ill-be-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design/wordpresscom-to-offer-theme-marketplace-and-why-ill-be-on-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you didn&#8217;t know, the folks over at Automattic are planning to add a Theme Marketplace to WordPress.com. It&#8217;ll allow the users to buy licenses to premium WordPress themes, for use on their hosted blogs. Given that there is more than 1.7m WP.com blogs, that should be a great deal for designers, right? Well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/wpcom.jpg' alt='WordPress.com' style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px; border:1px solid #aaa; padding: 3px;" />In case you didn&#8217;t know, the folks over at <a href="http://automattic.com">Automattic</a> are <a href="http://photomatt.net/2007/11/01/wpcom-marketplace-idea/">planning to add a Theme Marketplace</a> to <a href="http://wordpress.com">WordPress.com</a>. It&#8217;ll allow the users to buy licenses to premium WordPress themes, for use on their hosted blogs. Given that there is more than 1.7m WP.com blogs, that should be a great deal for designers, right?</p>
<p>Well, yes and no. There are a few kinks.</p>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;ll split the asked price for a theme license with Automattic, as in <strong>50% goes into their pocket.</strong></li>
<li>You&#8217;ll have to GPL your theme and offer it free outside of WP.com, as in <strong>every WordPress user with their own install can get it for free.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Basically, this means that if I make a premium theme and sell it on the WordPress.com Theme Marketplace for $50, Automattic will take $25 for every sale I make, and I won&#8217;t be able to sell it for use on self-hosted WordPress blogs since they just can download and install it themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Does that sound fair to you?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/11/01/wordpress-to-host-premium-themes-marketplace/">Tony Hung points out</a> that this should be a great way for upcoming designers to reach a big audience, and I agree &#8211; it sure is. But for people like me, who&#8217;s used to charge quite a bit more, it isn&#8217;t exactly a no-brainer, right? <span id="more-549"></span></p>
<p><strong>Wrong.</strong></p>
<p>If I do a premium theme to be sold on WordPress.com Theme Marketplace, that means I&#8217;m reaching possible customers that I usually don&#8217;t otherwise (since I&#8217;m not the kind of guy who likes to mod the Sandbox theme). That means I get my name out there, and I&#8217;ll be able to sell the one theme I do several times. Sure, I&#8217;ll have to release it to the masses of WordPress users outside of WordPress.com, but I have no problem with that &#8211; at the very least it&#8217;s great PR (both kinds) for me.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve gone this far by doing crappy work. Naturally, any theme I might release on the WordPress.com Theme Marketplace will be good and worth its price. That goes without saying.</p>
<p>So while it&#8217;s a natural choice for up and coming new designers, it&#8217;s also a pretty solid go for the established ones.</p>
<p>A small heads-up though. <strong>How many of these 1.7m+ blogs are run by people willing to spend a buck?</strong> Matt, are there any numbers on how many who are using premium services, for instance? What can designers expect, really? I mean, 1% of 1.7m is just 17 000, and they all won&#8217;t care for a premium theme, and certainly not just yours. What numbers do you base this venture on, throwing around 1.7m sounds good, but the number isn&#8217;t very interesting by itself. Cards on the table, please.</p>
<p>A sidenote. <a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2007/11/01/wordpress-theme-marketplace-hypocrisy-from-matt/">If this is hypocrisy or not on Matt&#8217;s behalf</a>, given the whole sponsored themes debacle, I don&#8217;t know. It sure makes you think though.</p>
<p><strong>Designers, would you offer your premium WordPress themes on a WordPress.com Theme Marketplace under these circumstances?</strong> Why, or why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/design/wordpresscom-to-offer-theme-marketplace-and-why-ill-be-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designers: The rounded corners are holding you back!</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/designers-the-rounded-corners-are-holding-you-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wisdump.com/design/designers-the-rounded-corners-are-holding-you-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design/designers-the-rounded-corners-are-holding-you-back/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know am, dead tired actually. Everything&#8217;s rounded these days, sometimes with a touch of gradients for depth. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with it, technically, I do it as well since it just plain looks good sometimes, but I do feel that especially blog design have gotten into a slump. I blame Kubrick. If you&#8217;re thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know am, dead tired actually. Everything&#8217;s rounded these days, sometimes with a touch of gradients for depth. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with it, technically, I do it as well since it just plain looks good sometimes, but I do feel that especially blog design have gotten into a slump.</p>
<p><img src='http://wisdump.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/thekubricktheme.jpg' alt='The Kubrick theme' style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 3px;" /><strong>I blame Kubrick.</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re thinking &#8220;The what now?&#8221; then you haven&#8217;t paid much attention to that default WordPress theme. It isn&#8217;t bad, it&#8217;s just old and in desperate need of a refreshing update. Or an honorable farewell, perhaps. It&#8217;s a bit stunning that they stick to it as the default theme really. Just look at the way it displays tags, as of WordPress 2.3 &#8211; a boring centered list below the post. It feels thrown in there, which it probably is.</p>
<p>While it might not be Kubrick that is responsible for all these rounded corner blog design today, it sure has been putting them in a limelight. Yes, it was new and cool, and rounded is the shape of Web 2.0 as well.</p>
<p>But enough is enough.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that you should go all blocky on me, dear designer reader, but maybe you should stop and think before you do yet another rounded box. Consider other forms, consider squares and uneven forms that might or might not bring lots of problems with your CSS coding, since there isn&#8217;t a billion tutorials covering that particular form out there.</p>
<p>Solve it. That&#8217;s the way we used to do. You see, when 28.8 kbps modems were king, we did table layouts and solved every weird little problem without Google. Without frameworks and CSS magic, Ajax and IE hacks.</p>
<p>Those weren&#8217;t the good times, don&#8217;t get me wrong here. They weren&#8217;t the lazy times either.</p>
<p><strong>Screw the rounded corners in your next design.</strong> I dare you. Maybe that particular project will prove to be an eye-opener. Because you know as well as I, that it&#8217;s way too easy to just slap something together in Photoshop, rounded with gradients and big fonts, a bit of Helvetica and a touch of Georgia and you&#8217;re there.</p>
<p>That might be all right, but it won&#8217;t help you evolve as a designer.</p>
<p><em>Grow Grow Grow</em>, wails PJ Harvey. Don&#8217;t mind if I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wisdump.com/design/designers-the-rounded-corners-are-holding-you-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

