<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s on your Web Typography wishlist? The W3C is asking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/css/whats-on-your-web-typography-wishlist-the-w3c-is-asking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/css/whats-on-your-web-typography-wishlist-the-w3c-is-asking/</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on design and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: outbreak &#187; Web Typography Sucks (written on May 15th, 2008 by Marko Mrdjenovic)</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/css/whats-on-your-web-typography-wishlist-the-w3c-is-asking/comment-page-1/#comment-148781</link>
		<dc:creator>outbreak &#187; Web Typography Sucks (written on May 15th, 2008 by Marko Mrdjenovic)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=746#comment-148781</guid>
		<description>[...] What&#8217;s on your Web Typography wishlist? The W3C is asking [via&#160;Zemanta] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What&#8217;s on your Web Typography wishlist? The W3C is asking [via&nbsp;Zemanta] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/css/whats-on-your-web-typography-wishlist-the-w3c-is-asking/comment-page-1/#comment-144639</link>
		<dc:creator>rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=746#comment-144639</guid>
		<description>Yeh. See your point.. in fact i agree with it. I just think that LOTS of people focus too much on the idea of &quot;pixel perfection&quot; than is really applicable to this domain.

I definately think it woudl be better to have tools at our disposal that allowed us to have that sort of control if we want it... but i also think it&#039;s a pipedream. The only solution at a browser level (in reality) would be to abolish IE (and probably Safari) in favour of one standardised browser - the likely hood of this happening is pretty obvious though..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh. See your point.. in fact i agree with it. I just think that LOTS of people focus too much on the idea of &#8220;pixel perfection&#8221; than is really applicable to this domain.</p>
<p>I definately think it woudl be better to have tools at our disposal that allowed us to have that sort of control if we want it&#8230; but i also think it&#8217;s a pipedream. The only solution at a browser level (in reality) would be to abolish IE (and probably Safari) in favour of one standardised browser &#8211; the likely hood of this happening is pretty obvious though..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophia Lucero</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/css/whats-on-your-web-typography-wishlist-the-w3c-is-asking/comment-page-1/#comment-144550</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophia Lucero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=746#comment-144550</guid>
		<description>Rex, yes, you have a point, but I still like to think it could be possible. And if it can&#039;t be helped, I still believe it&#039;s valid to lament all the cross-browser problems that are happening only because browser vendors can&#039;t find a way to render webpages the same way. It&#039;s more about hurdles to web standards than it is about being against fluidity, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex, yes, you have a point, but I still like to think it could be possible. And if it can&#8217;t be helped, I still believe it&#8217;s valid to lament all the cross-browser problems that are happening only because browser vendors can&#8217;t find a way to render webpages the same way. It&#8217;s more about hurdles to web standards than it is about being against fluidity, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/css/whats-on-your-web-typography-wishlist-the-w3c-is-asking/comment-page-1/#comment-143968</link>
		<dc:creator>rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=746#comment-143968</guid>
		<description>&quot;We all want pixel perfection, do we not? &quot;
- What for? So long as the designs you are producing aren&#039;t obviously flawed to the viewer.. is pixel perfection REALLY that important? 

Personally, i think with the way the web is going (fluid designs, content heavy layouts etc)... the pixel perfection mantra is going to become less and less important over time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We all want pixel perfection, do we not? &#8221;<br />
- What for? So long as the designs you are producing aren&#8217;t obviously flawed to the viewer.. is pixel perfection REALLY that important? </p>
<p>Personally, i think with the way the web is going (fluid designs, content heavy layouts etc)&#8230; the pixel perfection mantra is going to become less and less important over time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

