<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Critique: Read/WriteWeb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on design and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: larissa</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-101227</link>
		<dc:creator>larissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-101227</guid>
		<description>in my opinion RWW looks much better than any design composition for your redesgin.
you can still learn from RWW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in my opinion RWW looks much better than any design composition for your redesgin.<br />
you can still learn from RWW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-95849</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-95849</guid>
		<description>RRW does not have a poor design. Sure, the header is quite red and an eye sore (at least to me)...but over all I don&#039;t mind the structure and layout of the site one bit.

It feels organized, good use of whitespace, the design is clean.

I agree the comments and trackbacks need to be cleaned up or have some kind of spice added to them...but I agree with others...it is difficult to accept a site critique for an established site such as RWW when this site itself fails to impress, nor the redesign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RRW does not have a poor design. Sure, the header is quite red and an eye sore (at least to me)&#8230;but over all I don&#8217;t mind the structure and layout of the site one bit.</p>
<p>It feels organized, good use of whitespace, the design is clean.</p>
<p>I agree the comments and trackbacks need to be cleaned up or have some kind of spice added to them&#8230;but I agree with others&#8230;it is difficult to accept a site critique for an established site such as RWW when this site itself fails to impress, nor the redesign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Being Critical</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-94440</link>
		<dc:creator>On Being Critical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-94440</guid>
		<description>[...] on a side note regarding the post in question, there was one piece of criticism that struck true. The post should have had more constructive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a side note regarding the post in question, there was one piece of criticism that struck true. The post should have had more constructive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-93585</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-93585</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just stupid! The one with the biggest number of readers is right?! I&#039;m sure you see how well that argument stands!

Personally I think Thord is doing a great job with Wisdump. If he&#039;s gaining readers or dropping them since that other guy had it after Scrivs I don&#039;t know and I don&#039;t really care since I enjoy most of his posts.

BTW, I wonder how accurate Eeatonweb is? Does anybody know? I&#039;m guessing it&#039;s there just because it&#039;s a SplashPress site, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just stupid! The one with the biggest number of readers is right?! I&#8217;m sure you see how well that argument stands!</p>
<p>Personally I think Thord is doing a great job with Wisdump. If he&#8217;s gaining readers or dropping them since that other guy had it after Scrivs I don&#8217;t know and I don&#8217;t really care since I enjoy most of his posts.</p>
<p>BTW, I wonder how accurate Eeatonweb is? Does anybody know? I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s there just because it&#8217;s a SplashPress site, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-93553</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-93553</guid>
		<description>Actually, I do disagree with Thord for one simple reason. RWW is getting more popular and growing, while Wisdump is moving in the opposite direction. Look at the Eatonweb metrics box on the left side of this page if you would like a little supporting information.

If I am going to read design criticism, should I read it from the guy who is performing well or the guy whose performance is in decline?

Maybe my criticism was too harsh...I simply think Wisdump needs to find a little more direction and I don&#039;t think you can start giving out design criticism unless you can demonstrate that you walk the walk in addition to talking the talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I do disagree with Thord for one simple reason. RWW is getting more popular and growing, while Wisdump is moving in the opposite direction. Look at the Eatonweb metrics box on the left side of this page if you would like a little supporting information.</p>
<p>If I am going to read design criticism, should I read it from the guy who is performing well or the guy whose performance is in decline?</p>
<p>Maybe my criticism was too harsh&#8230;I simply think Wisdump needs to find a little more direction and I don&#8217;t think you can start giving out design criticism unless you can demonstrate that you walk the walk in addition to talking the talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-93484</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-93484</guid>
		<description>(Sorry for the two comments. Did something weird when writing and it submitted.)

I doesn&#039;t matter if the redesign of Wisdump is good or bad because the criticism to RWW is valid. The design is lacking in so many ways it&#039;s scary. Not once did I see Thord writing that he was better than RWW, he wrote about his point of view regarding the design. And there are constructive pointers in there as well, although I do agree that I would want to know how he thinks they could improve.

I won&#039;t discuss the new Wisdump design with you because I only see downsized mockups. I think it looks clean and nice, fitting for this site, but I won&#039;t talk about it until it&#039;s done. Your comments on it in your criticism to this post is just plain silly. Talk about the content of the post instead. For instance, do you disagree with Thord on what he says on RWW? Then tell us why, and what you think! That&#039;s a valid comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sorry for the two comments. Did something weird when writing and it submitted.)</p>
<p>I doesn&#8217;t matter if the redesign of Wisdump is good or bad because the criticism to RWW is valid. The design is lacking in so many ways it&#8217;s scary. Not once did I see Thord writing that he was better than RWW, he wrote about his point of view regarding the design. And there are constructive pointers in there as well, although I do agree that I would want to know how he thinks they could improve.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t discuss the new Wisdump design with you because I only see downsized mockups. I think it looks clean and nice, fitting for this site, but I won&#8217;t talk about it until it&#8217;s done. Your comments on it in your criticism to this post is just plain silly. Talk about the content of the post instead. For instance, do you disagree with Thord on what he says on RWW? Then tell us why, and what you think! That&#8217;s a valid comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-93481</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-93481</guid>
		<description>Then why are you here? To bitch and whine? That sounds like time wasted to me.

I understand you don&#039;t work for RWW. It&#039;s pretty obvious. Just like the &quot;joke&quot; was. Get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why are you here? To bitch and whine? That sounds like time wasted to me.</p>
<p>I understand you don&#8217;t work for RWW. It&#8217;s pretty obvious. Just like the &#8220;joke&#8221; was. Get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-92643</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-92643</guid>
		<description>No. I don&#039;t work for RWW. I have been following wisdump since it&#039;s 9rules/scrivs days. My point is really that if you are going to publicly criticize someones work you should make sure yours is spot on. 

In the case of the latest (v3) sample of the wisdump design concepts...where is the grid? Look at the sidebar and look at how many seperate vertical margins exist. Look at how many horizantal margins exist...why is the top of the sidebar above the main headline for the first content item?  

The point is not just that the redesign is shit. The point is that it takes big balls to criticize someones work when your own work is so lackluster and un-inspired. The thing is RWW probably does not care what wisdump looks like...no one has since scrivs sold it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I don&#8217;t work for RWW. I have been following wisdump since it&#8217;s 9rules/scrivs days. My point is really that if you are going to publicly criticize someones work you should make sure yours is spot on. </p>
<p>In the case of the latest (v3) sample of the wisdump design concepts&#8230;where is the grid? Look at the sidebar and look at how many seperate vertical margins exist. Look at how many horizantal margins exist&#8230;why is the top of the sidebar above the main headline for the first content item?  </p>
<p>The point is not just that the redesign is shit. The point is that it takes big balls to criticize someones work when your own work is so lackluster and un-inspired. The thing is RWW probably does not care what wisdump looks like&#8230;no one has since scrivs sold it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhett</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-92229</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-92229</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Stephen. I&#039;m not saying I&#039;m in love with the RWW design, it has it&#039;s issues, but slamming other site designs (with no &#039;constructive&#039; critism) and changing wisdump to a ho hum design yourself will lose me as a reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Stephen. I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m in love with the RWW design, it has it&#8217;s issues, but slamming other site designs (with no &#8216;constructive&#8217; critism) and changing wisdump to a ho hum design yourself will lose me as a reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/comment-page-1/#comment-92154</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/design-critique-readwriteweb/#comment-92154</guid>
		<description>LOL @ Stephen
Not that I agree with you or anything... and what you say have nothing to do with the fact that the post is kinda spot on... Work at RWW do you? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL @ Stephen<br />
Not that I agree with you or anything&#8230; and what you say have nothing to do with the fact that the post is kinda spot on&#8230; Work at RWW do you? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

