<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Side by Side: The New ProBlogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=side-by-side-the-new-problogger</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reading: August 18, 2007 : Average Joe Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-26234</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reading: August 18, 2007 : Average Joe Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-26234</guid>
		<description>[...] are some strong opinions about it. Before making your own decision, you might be interested in Wisdump&#8217;s side by side comparison of old and new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are some strong opinions about it. Before making your own decision, you might be interested in Wisdump&#8217;s side by side comparison of old and new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Imel &#187; Recap: Big Blog News</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-26022</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Imel &#187; Recap: Big Blog News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-26022</guid>
		<description>[...] Side by Side: The New ProBlogger - New stuff over at Wisdump. Darren Rowse launched a new site last week, and I did a once-over review of his work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Side by Side: The New ProBlogger &#8211; New stuff over at Wisdump. Darren Rowse launched a new site last week, and I did a once-over review of his work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogsolid &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Welcome To The Blogging Afterparty</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-26005</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogsolid &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Welcome To The Blogging Afterparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-26005</guid>
		<description>[...] improvement. Some are of the opinion that this signifies a change that is larger than just design. Wisdump says: This is what makes me wonder if ProBlogger isn’t headed away from the traditional blog setup. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] improvement. Some are of the opinion that this signifies a change that is larger than just design. Wisdump says: This is what makes me wonder if ProBlogger isn’t headed away from the traditional blog setup. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Imel</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-25443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Imel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-25443</guid>
		<description>@Todd: Well thanks for being the first to comment! I see what you&#039;re saying about the Google Ads thing...Anytime a design switches to this style, that&#039;s a common complaint.

@J David: Interesting comparison. I would say I like the CopyBlogger design more as well, but probably because it&#039;s a bit cleaner and uses whitespace very well. 

@David: Thanks for the link. I checked out his review, it was very solid.

Thanks for reading and commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd: Well thanks for being the first to comment! I see what you&#8217;re saying about the Google Ads thing&#8230;Anytime a design switches to this style, that&#8217;s a common complaint.</p>
<p>@J David: Interesting comparison. I would say I like the CopyBlogger design more as well, but probably because it&#8217;s a bit cleaner and uses whitespace very well. </p>
<p>@David: Thanks for the link. I checked out his review, it was very solid.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-25439</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-25439</guid>
		<description>Over on my new blog, a friend of mine has also done an in depth analysis of the new design. He also gives it a strong thumbs down.

http://xfep.com/design/mistakes-in-design-probloggernet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over on my new blog, a friend of mine has also done an in depth analysis of the new design. He also gives it a strong thumbs down.</p>
<p><a href="http://xfep.com/design/mistakes-in-design-probloggernet/" rel="nofollow">http://xfep.com/design/mistakes-in-design-probloggernet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J David</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-25121</link>
		<dc:creator>J David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-25121</guid>
		<description>To me, the layout is very reminiscent of &lt;a href=&quot;http://copyblogger.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Copyblogger&lt;/a&gt;; the width, the 3 columns, the positioning of the ads. Yet somehow I like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://copyblogger.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Copyblogger&lt;/a&gt; design, but not the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ProBlogger&lt;/a&gt; one... I think it has to do with the colors for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the layout is very reminiscent of <a href="http://copyblogger.com/" rel="nofollow">Copyblogger</a>; the width, the 3 columns, the positioning of the ads. Yet somehow I like the <a href="http://copyblogger.com/" rel="nofollow">Copyblogger</a> design, but not the <a href="http://www.problogger.net" rel="nofollow">ProBlogger</a> one&#8230; I think it has to do with the colors for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-25109</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/design-critiques/side-by-side-the-new-problogger/#comment-25109</guid>
		<description>not sure why no one has commented on this yet.  The only reason I didn&#039;t at first was because I don&#039;t use pro blogger.

Good writeup, very well planned out.  I personally like the new layout, but there is one thing that is really bugging me about it.

Almost everything on the main page reminds me of a google add.  at a quick glance, I would have said it was a page full of ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure why no one has commented on this yet.  The only reason I didn&#8217;t at first was because I don&#8217;t use pro blogger.</p>
<p>Good writeup, very well planned out.  I personally like the new layout, but there is one thing that is really bugging me about it.</p>
<p>Almost everything on the main page reminds me of a google add.  at a quick glance, I would have said it was a page full of ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
