<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snap.com: Homepage Critique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on design and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snaplist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wisdump: Snap.com - Homepage Critique</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4682</link>
		<dc:creator>Snaplist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wisdump: Snap.com - Homepage Critique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 05:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4682</guid>
		<description>[...] Read Full Post: Snap.com - Homepage Critique    Posted by jason Filed in Snap Site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read Full Post: Snap.com &#8211; Homepage Critique    Posted by jason Filed in Snap Site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snap.com Review &#187; Wisdump</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4681</link>
		<dc:creator>Snap.com Review &#187; Wisdump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4681</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of days ago when I posted my tiny design critique of Snap&#8217;s homepage Jason Santa Maria almost wrote today&#8217;s review for me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of days ago when I posted my tiny design critique of Snap&#8217;s homepage Jason Santa Maria almost wrote today&#8217;s review for me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenobi</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4680</link>
		<dc:creator>kenobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4680</guid>
		<description>Not exactly a Google killer is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly a Google killer is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>I look at Snap as a nice &#039;tech demo&#039; of the shape of things to come in the not-so-distant future. Right now it feels slow, bloated and there&#039;s design flaws that Jason already mentioned.

It&#039;s not at all a contender to Google, not even close. I liked playing with it but before I&#039;d use this as my primary search engine a LOT will have to change ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look at Snap as a nice &#8216;tech demo&#8217; of the shape of things to come in the not-so-distant future. Right now it feels slow, bloated and there&#8217;s design flaws that Jason already mentioned.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not at all a contender to Google, not even close. I liked playing with it but before I&#8217;d use this as my primary search engine a LOT will have to change ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4678</guid>
		<description>Jason Santa Maria said exactly what I was thinking, &quot;Snap is a waste of space. Itâ€™s so slow and bloated, it renders itself practically useless. I donâ€™t need a search engine to load in big images for the results, just give me the damn information!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Santa Maria said exactly what I was thinking, &#8220;Snap is a waste of space. Itâ€™s so slow and bloated, it renders itself practically useless. I donâ€™t need a search engine to load in big images for the results, just give me the damn information!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4677</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 20:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4677</guid>
		<description>Darn, and I came here to post what Eddie already said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn, and I came here to post what Eddie already said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4676</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4676</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that&#039;s even worse then now isn&#039;t it Eddie. I will have to play with it at different resolutions to see how it really works out. I guess I assumed that since it scaled with my browser window it was purely liquid, but maybe they have a min-width stuck in there somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#8217;s even worse then now isn&#8217;t it Eddie. I will have to play with it at different resolutions to see how it really works out. I guess I assumed that since it scaled with my browser window it was purely liquid, but maybe they have a min-width stuck in there somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Sowden</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4675</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Sowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4675</guid>
		<description>You say that it needs using at a smaller resolution however, I am sitting here in an 800px wide browser (I always surf 800px wide) and the links and the word search just go off the side. I dont even get the &quot;show top news headlines&quot; link. The way they have done it there isnt even a scroll bar so I can see what is going on over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say that it needs using at a smaller resolution however, I am sitting here in an 800px wide browser (I always surf 800px wide) and the links and the word search just go off the side. I dont even get the &#8220;show top news headlines&#8221; link. The way they have done it there isnt even a scroll bar so I can see what is going on over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Santa Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Santa Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 17:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4674</guid>
		<description>&quot;...itâ€™s not that hard to find the links at the bottom of the page, since thereâ€™s nothing else to see.&quot;

That&#039;s just it, in the search engine space even &quot;not that hard&quot; is too hard. Especially when you are going up against something like Google. It wouldn&#039;t be that bad if the small links were the greatest offender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;itâ€™s not that hard to find the links at the bottom of the page, since thereâ€™s nothing else to see.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just it, in the search engine space even &#8220;not that hard&#8221; is too hard. Especially when you are going up against something like Google. It wouldn&#8217;t be that bad if the small links were the greatest offender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design-critiques/snapcom-homepage-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-4673</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=197#comment-4673</guid>
		<description>True a big search box is pretty self-explanatory, but it&#039;s what happens after the search box that might confuse a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True a big search box is pretty self-explanatory, but it&#8217;s what happens after the search box that might confuse a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

