<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hiding Behind Good Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on design and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Bradford</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7448</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Bradford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7448</guid>
		<description>as someone who just finished redesigning his blog, i&#039;ll take all this to heart :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as someone who just finished redesigning his blog, i&#8217;ll take all this to heart :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montoya</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7442</link>
		<dc:creator>Montoya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7442</guid>
		<description>&quot;How many times does a person get labeled a design expert because of a great design and shitty writing?&quot;

Every damn day. It sucks that I have to compete in a niche where people rarely value the actual writing, and I can&#039;t get immediate sign-ups because I don&#039;t have a &quot;shiny spanking awesome&quot; design. At least I&#039;m working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How many times does a person get labeled a design expert because of a great design and shitty writing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Every damn day. It sucks that I have to compete in a niche where people rarely value the actual writing, and I can&#8217;t get immediate sign-ups because I don&#8217;t have a &#8220;shiny spanking awesome&#8221; design. At least I&#8217;m working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7447</guid>
		<description>â€œperhaps the best-known design and usability guru on the Internetâ€ Thatâ€™s what the Financial Times said about Jakob Nielsen. His site is a wonder to beholdâ€¦ http://www.useit.com/jakob/ just kidding actually as it is probably the most bland layout I have ever seen but the content and the smarts he dispenses can not be beatâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œperhaps the best-known design and usability guru on the Internetâ€ Thatâ€™s what the Financial Times said about Jakob Nielsen. His site is a wonder to beholdâ€¦ <a href="http://www.useit.com/jakob/" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/jakob/</a> just kidding actually as it is probably the most bland layout I have ever seen but the content and the smarts he dispenses can not be beatâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7441</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7441</guid>
		<description>&quot;perhaps the best-known design and usability guru on the Internet&quot; That&#039;s what the Financial Times said about Jakob Nielsen. His site is a wonder to behold... http://www.useit.com/jakob/ just kidding actually as it is probably the most bland layout I have ever seen but the content and the smarts he dispenses can not be beat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;perhaps the best-known design and usability guru on the Internet&#8221; That&#8217;s what the Financial Times said about Jakob Nielsen. His site is a wonder to behold&#8230; <a href="http://www.useit.com/jakob/" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/jakob/</a> just kidding actually as it is probably the most bland layout I have ever seen but the content and the smarts he dispenses can not be beat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7446</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7446</guid>
		<description>Ack - Jeff beat me to it. I see functionality and visual design going hand-in-hand. They both work together to solve a problem, which is what design basically is - finding solutions to problems within constraints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack &#8211; Jeff beat me to it. I see functionality and visual design going hand-in-hand. They both work together to solve a problem, which is what design basically is &#8211; finding solutions to problems within constraints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuba Filipowski</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7445</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuba Filipowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7445</guid>
		<description>Agree with Jeff - I think good design it&#039;s about how it solves interaction - and that we can objectively estimate. 	Aesthetics is much more individual - basically every one can say, &quot;I don&#039;t like it&quot; about decoration but you can&#039;t say it&#039;s not working when it actually does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Jeff &#8211; I think good design it&#8217;s about how it solves interaction &#8211; and that we can objectively estimate. 	Aesthetics is much more individual &#8211; basically every one can say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t like it&#8221; about decoration but you can&#8217;t say it&#8217;s not working when it actually does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick B</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7444</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7444</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A couple of years ago Volkswagen leaned heavily on hiding behind the design of their cars until Consumer Reports rated them the lowest with regards to car performance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think they suffered from bad reliability, not performance. But your point still holds.

And I don&#039;t think your site has a bad design. I&#039;m not a fan of the current look, but the old &quot;whitespace&quot; blog was very innovative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A couple of years ago Volkswagen leaned heavily on hiding behind the design of their cars until Consumer Reports rated them the lowest with regards to car performance.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think they suffered from bad reliability, not performance. But your point still holds.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think your site has a bad design. I&#8217;m not a fan of the current look, but the old &#8220;whitespace&#8221; blog was very innovative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Croft</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/hiding-behind-good-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7443</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=312#comment-7443</guid>
		<description>Obviously by &quot;design,&quot; you mean  &quot;visual design&quot; and &quot;aesthetics,&quot; and that&#039;s cool. But I think it&#039;s really important for designers to understand that *how it works* is part of the design. 

I wouldn&#039;t say Volkswagen used to hide behind design -- I would say they hid behind *style*, which is a subset of design. After the poor ratings, they stopped putting all their design eggs in the style basket and started putting some of the elsewhere. 

Google, by and large, isn&#039;t stylish. But, for the most part, their products are well-designed. It&#039;s be nice if they were stylish too, but I still think most of them are well-designed.

Bottom line: any serious designer needs to understand that design is about communication and problem-solving. Style and fashion are only one piece of that puzzle.

If all you do is style, then you&#039;re a decorator, not a designer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously by &#8220;design,&#8221; you mean  &#8220;visual design&#8221; and &#8220;aesthetics,&#8221; and that&#8217;s cool. But I think it&#8217;s really important for designers to understand that *how it works* is part of the design. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say Volkswagen used to hide behind design &#8212; I would say they hid behind *style*, which is a subset of design. After the poor ratings, they stopped putting all their design eggs in the style basket and started putting some of the elsewhere. </p>
<p>Google, by and large, isn&#8217;t stylish. But, for the most part, their products are well-designed. It&#8217;s be nice if they were stylish too, but I still think most of them are well-designed.</p>
<p>Bottom line: any serious designer needs to understand that design is about communication and problem-solving. Style and fashion are only one piece of that puzzle.</p>
<p>If all you do is style, then you&#8217;re a decorator, not a designer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

