<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USAToday And What&#8217;s Really Wrong With Social Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Earth To USAToday: Adding Social Features Does Not Fix The Ugly &#124; Business Logs</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8992</link>
		<dc:creator>Earth To USAToday: Adding Social Features Does Not Fix The Ugly &#124; Business Logs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=322#comment-8992</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul echoes my opinion: &#8220;While you can applaud the fact that they are taking a step in the “right” direction with more interactive features, how does the design encourage interaction on the site at all? Its as though they are too scared to make anything prominent so they went the next best route and made absolutely nothing prominent.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul echoes my opinion: &#8220;While you can applaud the fact that they are taking a step in the “right” direction with more interactive features, how does the design encourage interaction on the site at all? Its as though they are too scared to make anything prominent so they went the next best route and made absolutely nothing prominent.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aneta &#124; SocialDesignSite</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7688</link>
		<dc:creator>Aneta &#124; SocialDesignSite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 11:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=322#comment-7688</guid>
		<description>I have the impression that social design is only associated with designing the web for people in means of communication. However, social design has a deeper meaning. Social design aims at highlighting different aspects of our social world. Design, in this sense, is any circumstance that is a result of action. This broad definition also implicates that design can be unconscious. It is there whether we are aware of it or not. It is inescapable. Social design, then, is at the same time a great opportunity and a great responsibility because it relies on the choices we make every day. It is the perception of a man-made reality that consequently can only be changed by man.
That can be social deisgn not only a design of a website for social purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the impression that social design is only associated with designing the web for people in means of communication. However, social design has a deeper meaning. Social design aims at highlighting different aspects of our social world. Design, in this sense, is any circumstance that is a result of action. This broad definition also implicates that design can be unconscious. It is there whether we are aware of it or not. It is inescapable. Social design, then, is at the same time a great opportunity and a great responsibility because it relies on the choices we make every day. It is the perception of a man-made reality that consequently can only be changed by man.<br />
That can be social deisgn not only a design of a website for social purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pepe</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7687</link>
		<dc:creator>pepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=322#comment-7687</guid>
		<description>It is fear of missing out on something that leads to designs like this one. They have gone for a lot of social features and at the same time pass down the job of information selection to the reader. What might work for digg-style sites and news aggregators is not automatically the best choice for a well-known newspaper&#039;s homepage. The readership has expectaions of a brand like USA Today, you can&#039;t just go wild and bang in social features randomly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fear of missing out on something that leads to designs like this one. They have gone for a lot of social features and at the same time pass down the job of information selection to the reader. What might work for digg-style sites and news aggregators is not automatically the best choice for a well-known newspaper&#8217;s homepage. The readership has expectaions of a brand like USA Today, you can&#8217;t just go wild and bang in social features randomly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USAToday: Anti-Social Readers? &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7686</link>
		<dc:creator>USAToday: Anti-Social Readers? &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=322#comment-7686</guid>
		<description>[...] Additional Reading: Scott Karp, Paris Lemon, Mathew Ingram, Charlene Li&#8217;s Blog, Wisdump [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Additional Reading: Scott Karp, Paris Lemon, Mathew Ingram, Charlene Li&#8217;s Blog, Wisdump [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pt</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7685</link>
		<dc:creator>pt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=322#comment-7685</guid>
		<description>Good post, thanks. To me, it seems like much of the corporate web lately: devoid of any real &quot;love&quot; or personality, and without a soul. Things have been moved around but I&#039;m not sure it encourages interaction from me -- I clicked twice and left to post this reply...

Hey, maybe they got a deal on a set of templates and can cut overhead (and thus boost profits for shareholders)? It&#039;s short on TITLE and ALT tags, and the &quot;color-coding&quot; of different verticals doesn&#039;t seem to add much value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, thanks. To me, it seems like much of the corporate web lately: devoid of any real &#8220;love&#8221; or personality, and without a soul. Things have been moved around but I&#8217;m not sure it encourages interaction from me &#8212; I clicked twice and left to post this reply&#8230;</p>
<p>Hey, maybe they got a deal on a set of templates and can cut overhead (and thus boost profits for shareholders)? It&#8217;s short on TITLE and ALT tags, and the &#8220;color-coding&#8221; of different verticals doesn&#8217;t seem to add much value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/design/usatoday-and-whats-really-wrong-with-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-7684</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=322#comment-7684</guid>
		<description>The new design is a mess. I&#039;ve done a quick analysis, but I&#039;m pretty sure that any professional web designer would be able to spot dozens of flaws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new design is a mess. I&#8217;ve done a quick analysis, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that any professional web designer would be able to spot dozens of flaws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
