<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gizmodo, Lifehacker Go Political</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lail</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/comment-page-1/#comment-8284</link>
		<dc:creator>Lail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=372#comment-8284</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re all wrong. It sounds like Gizmodo and Lifehacker are stating what *their* policy is going to be. As two highly successful sites, they likely know better than to think they can control what visitors do. They&#039;re stating their position and leading by example by taking the Digg badges off. I respect the position they&#039;ve settled at and think it&#039;s a ethical one at a time where content hijacking for hits is a real issue. These sites have become &quot;Heavy Weight&quot; blogs, as you state - and as such need to put themselves in a position of leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re all wrong. It sounds like Gizmodo and Lifehacker are stating what *their* policy is going to be. As two highly successful sites, they likely know better than to think they can control what visitors do. They&#8217;re stating their position and leading by example by taking the Digg badges off. I respect the position they&#8217;ve settled at and think it&#8217;s a ethical one at a time where content hijacking for hits is a real issue. These sites have become &#8220;Heavy Weight&#8221; blogs, as you state &#8211; and as such need to put themselves in a position of leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NY Times on Digg &#124; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/comment-page-1/#comment-8283</link>
		<dc:creator>The NY Times on Digg &#124; TechWag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=372#comment-8283</guid>
		<description>[...] In the mean time some folks are not happy and think this is all about Political Correctness. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the mean time some folks are not happy and think this is all about Political Correctness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/comment-page-1/#comment-8282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=372#comment-8282</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with the policy. They&#039;re popular because they&#039;re good editors, and not necessarily because of the original content they create. If they do a good job of pointing to excellent content on each of their blogs, they keep their audience happy and reward people who are creating great content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with the policy. They&#8217;re popular because they&#8217;re good editors, and not necessarily because of the original content they create. If they do a good job of pointing to excellent content on each of their blogs, they keep their audience happy and reward people who are creating great content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montoya</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/comment-page-1/#comment-8281</link>
		<dc:creator>Montoya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=372#comment-8281</guid>
		<description>pablasso: I disagree. This is an interesting issue, even if it just relates to a few small players here. 

I think Gizmodo is being a bit oxymoronic here... if they don&#039;t want to get credit for the content of others, then why don&#039;t they just make all articles original period? They already make money off of posting the content of others, and it helps their popularity too. At least if those stories get Dugg, it drives traffic to the original content source... now those stories might not get Dugg and the original content sources will get less rewards for their work. Sounds like a stupid direction to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pablasso: I disagree. This is an interesting issue, even if it just relates to a few small players here. </p>
<p>I think Gizmodo is being a bit oxymoronic here&#8230; if they don&#8217;t want to get credit for the content of others, then why don&#8217;t they just make all articles original period? They already make money off of posting the content of others, and it helps their popularity too. At least if those stories get Dugg, it drives traffic to the original content source&#8230; now those stories might not get Dugg and the original content sources will get less rewards for their work. Sounds like a stupid direction to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablasso</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/personal/gizmodo-lifehacker-go-political/comment-page-1/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator>pablasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=372#comment-8280</guid>
		<description>aren&#039;t you doing a whole of drama out of nothing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aren&#8217;t you doing a whole of drama out of nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
