May 20, 2010 2 replies

Google enters the @font-face business

Google Font Directory

Google is throwing its own hat into the web fonts ring with the Google Font Directory and the Google Font API. While it appears it doesn’t have any partnerships with the big names in typography like TypeKit does, just a handful of open fonts, it does have a partnership with TypeKit itself (as you’ll see below).

How the Google Font API works

Once you pick a font, you can embed it on a webpage by grabbing code that looks like this:

<link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Josefin+Sans+Std+Light' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>

And use it in your stylesheet like this:

h1 { font-family: 'Josefin Sans Std Light', arial, serif; }

You can also use other fonts using the WebFont Loader, which is a JavaScript library developed by Google and TypeKit.

Bane or Boon?

Google Font API

Although I won’t be ditching Font Squirrel anytime soon, one great thing about this new development is that the fonts are hosted on the most reliable servers in the world, just like the different JavaScript libraries are. The even greater thing is that this is Google, one of the strongest forces on the Web, is placing a stake another aspect of web standards.

Of course those things are scary at the same time. Google can just pick any endeavor under the sun, spend resources on it, and possibly dominate, if not dictate the market in no time. It may not get the purist designer types on board, since Google doesn’t exactly have the best reputation for great design, and its presentation has a bit of a developer slant, but it knows its web design technologies well. And in the case of web standards, where new practices are being adopted and old browsers are being discarded at a snail’s pace, Google’s massive resources and influence can only do well to speed things up.

January 13, 2010 2 replies

The League of Movable Type asks: how important is open source typography to you?

Onomatopoeia comic spread

I’ll get straight to my answer: very.

More specifically, I’m quite excited about what this league is doing for a branch of typography which seems almost mythical. We know about paid fonts and free fonts, but what’s buzzing big right now is the use of fonts on the web with the emergence of @font-face embedding, webfonts, and services like TypeKit. But what about usage and modification of fonts in general?

The open source debate is always tricky when creative works are in question, but the case shouldn’t be different for typefaces. The League is going beyond that debate, but still has some tough questions to be answered:

Is open source typography important enough to fight for? Are we all brave enough to do something to change the status quo? Is the status quo okay, do we really need to change anything at all?

What is the status quo? If this 3-year old post is any indication, it looks like a sleepy town that needs some jazzing up. The Open Font Library is more closely linked to the open source software community than with the open source design community, but they mentioned Lettercase being a Github-like tool, so it looks like they’re taking steps towards that already.

Should we fight for open source typography and change the status quo? It could potentially compete alongside the hosted font embedding services and create a fine alternative for web designers using custom web fonts. Options are good.

Sound off with your thoughts there!