<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can you just &#8216;build&#8217; a web application?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on design and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spooky</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/comment-page-1/#comment-8109</link>
		<dc:creator>Spooky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 15:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=345#comment-8109</guid>
		<description>I suppose I should have covered more that when you are building your engine and features, it would be smart to use security functions with whatever language you are using, although in a general sense, when creating an application, say in PHP, and you have been doing it for some time you would know that a textarea viewable to the public should receive htmlspecialchars() and other functions of choice, and when you hit the beta testing stage it will (hopefully) catch errors and security holes. If you were neglectful from the start, a beta test will still open your eyes.

Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I should have covered more that when you are building your engine and features, it would be smart to use security functions with whatever language you are using, although in a general sense, when creating an application, say in PHP, and you have been doing it for some time you would know that a textarea viewable to the public should receive htmlspecialchars() and other functions of choice, and when you hit the beta testing stage it will (hopefully) catch errors and security holes. If you were neglectful from the start, a beta test will still open your eyes.</p>
<p>Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/comment-page-1/#comment-8108</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=345#comment-8108</guid>
		<description>Ryan, some fantastic points here. However, I have to agree with Daniel here on the point that security should be designed in from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, some fantastic points here. However, I have to agree with Daniel here on the point that security should be designed in from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/comment-page-1/#comment-8106</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=345#comment-8106</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your mention of security at the prerelease and release stage, and here is why:

- Security should be designed in from the beginning
- Whilst you mention designing the application with the user in mind, this is where security should also feature
- With every use case, there needs to be a mis-use case
- Security is not a bolt-on at the end, this is why Web 2.0 is a massive insecure mess and more sites are getting attacked.

Developers need to think more like attackers when it comes to designing and deploying their applications, especially since it helps them understand how the application will be mis-used.

Daniel
http://owasp.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your mention of security at the prerelease and release stage, and here is why:</p>
<p>- Security should be designed in from the beginning<br />
- Whilst you mention designing the application with the user in mind, this is where security should also feature<br />
- With every use case, there needs to be a mis-use case<br />
- Security is not a bolt-on at the end, this is why Web 2.0 is a massive insecure mess and more sites are getting attacked.</p>
<p>Developers need to think more like attackers when it comes to designing and deploying their applications, especially since it helps them understand how the application will be mis-used.</p>
<p>Daniel<br />
<a href="http://owasp.org" rel="nofollow">http://owasp.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/comment-page-1/#comment-8107</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=345#comment-8107</guid>
		<description>First off, It&#039;s good to know that you got accepted as a new Wisdump blogger and I look forward to reading your posts. I have actually been planning on doing a couple web applications in the future (I don&#039;t really know what yet) and I believe everything you said will help build a good, useful system. Beta testing is always a great idea because, like you said, it allows you to get rid of all the bugs and keep the system in good shape throughout the time it is being used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, It&#8217;s good to know that you got accepted as a new Wisdump blogger and I look forward to reading your posts. I have actually been planning on doing a couple web applications in the future (I don&#8217;t really know what yet) and I believe everything you said will help build a good, useful system. Beta testing is always a great idea because, like you said, it allows you to get rid of all the bugs and keep the system in good shape throughout the time it is being used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 01010</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/can-you-just-build-a-web-application/comment-page-1/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>01010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 18:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=345#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>Sounds like good advice, Ryan. You say &quot;There is this new thing in Web 2.0 that is called usability&quot;. I thought that had disappeared a lot with all the huge bandwidth, ajax and javascript messes around the place, although the big fonts are great. Hopefully by web 3 usability will be completely commonplace ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like good advice, Ryan. You say &#8220;There is this new thing in Web 2.0 that is called usability&#8221;. I thought that had disappeared a lot with all the huge bandwidth, ajax and javascript messes around the place, although the big fonts are great. Hopefully by web 3 usability will be completely commonplace ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
