<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Handcoding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=handcoding</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2/4/09 ::: week 1</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-285294</link>
		<dc:creator>eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2/4/09 ::: week 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-285294</guid>
		<description>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 1/5/08 :: week 1</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-143103</link>
		<dc:creator>eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 1/5/08 :: week 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-143103</guid>
		<description>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; week 3</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-138799</link>
		<dc:creator>eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; week 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-138799</guid>
		<description>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; week 2</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-138690</link>
		<dc:creator>eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; week 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-138690</guid>
		<description>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; week 1</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-138610</link>
		<dc:creator>eyelearn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; week 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-138610</guid>
		<description>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisdumo.com Handcoding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highpowered</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-89737</link>
		<dc:creator>Highpowered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-89737</guid>
		<description>I find WYSIWY(M)G editors helpful in keeping my codebase, libraries and assets organized. For me, the first thing I do when using an editing application is to adjust the code formatting settings. The design view rarely matches what you&#039;re going to see on a live browser (Expression Web really sucks in this regard), but I will take quick glances from time to time - mostly to navigate to places in the code.

Learning to build pages with WYSIWY(M)G before learning to hand code is like learning to use a calculator before learning arithmetic first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find WYSIWY(M)G editors helpful in keeping my codebase, libraries and assets organized. For me, the first thing I do when using an editing application is to adjust the code formatting settings. The design view rarely matches what you&#8217;re going to see on a live browser (Expression Web really sucks in this regard), but I will take quick glances from time to time &#8211; mostly to navigate to places in the code.</p>
<p>Learning to build pages with WYSIWY(M)G before learning to hand code is like learning to use a calculator before learning arithmetic first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zion</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-77020</link>
		<dc:creator>Zion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-77020</guid>
		<description>Handcode or not,the question is are you gonna get the job done or not,in the end its not about the technique so stop boosting your egoes,we all wanna get it done,my boss does not care cause i did the Photoshop and Dreamweaver course and i&#039;ve designed more than 24 website and im still just 20,i do not code my sites from  but that does not mean im not familiar with &lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt; or ,nuff said...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Handcode or not,the question is are you gonna get the job done or not,in the end its not about the technique so stop boosting your egoes,we all wanna get it done,my boss does not care cause i did the Photoshop and Dreamweaver course and i&#8217;ve designed more than 24 website and im still just 20,i do not code my sites from  but that does not mean im not familiar with <b></b> or ,nuff said&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does It Matter &#124; You are not special. You are not beautiful or unique snowflakes. We are the same decaying orgainc matter as everone else. &#187; The old debate.</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-2400</link>
		<dc:creator>Does It Matter &#124; You are not special. You are not beautiful or unique snowflakes. We are the same decaying orgainc matter as everone else. &#187; The old debate.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-2400</guid>
		<description>[...] To hand code or not? That is the question. I error on the side of hand-coding. I participated in this debate back in 2005 and ran across the article again and its worth posting. More after the jump. To hand-code or not?Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To hand code or not? That is the question. I error on the side of hand-coding. I participated in this debate back in 2005 and ran across the article again and its worth posting. More after the jump. To hand-code or not?Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-2/#comment-2401</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-2401</guid>
		<description>I am with you... i do all my own coding as a hand-coder and have been using this term for some time now. You can view examples of my hand coding at www.imenuhq.com or www.hookuphq.com

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you&#8230; i do all my own coding as a hand-coder and have been using this term for some time now. You can view examples of my hand coding at <a href="http://www.imenuhq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imenuhq.com</a> or <a href="http://www.hookuphq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hookuphq.com</a></p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee CarrÃ©</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web-programming/handcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee CarrÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 05:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=97#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>with regard to methods of producing typography works, be they writen by hand (with a pen) or typed into a machine, I would argue that providing the author actually *wants* to produce a quality document, that a word processor will actually have the most benificial impact on quality

this is only speaking from my own experience, but the ability to change even the tiny detail of a document easilly and quickly makes it worth-while.
That is, rewording a sentense doesn&#039;t involve re-writing or re-typing (in the case of typewriters) the entire page, only to find another mistake, or area for improvement

This approch also allows changes to be easilly made at some point in the future, when the author might have new ideas (eg, say they&#039;re writing a novel, are half-way through and get stuck. Later they come back with a different idea for the plot, and are able to change a few pages to move the plot in the new direction)

This effect is much more profound when wanting to make small changes to many pages (on paper you, of course, would have to rewrite each page in question)

Good usability design is always part of the process of a true professional, as is constant revision of what has been produced so far. To that end, I at least go through many revisions of a text before i consider it &quot;finished&quot;.
Word processing allows this to happen much quicker, and far more easilly.

So from my point of view, with regard to improved typography and usability of content, word processing is a good thing, which improves the quality of text which would otherwise suffer if trully done &quot;by hand&quot; directly on paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with regard to methods of producing typography works, be they writen by hand (with a pen) or typed into a machine, I would argue that providing the author actually *wants* to produce a quality document, that a word processor will actually have the most benificial impact on quality</p>
<p>this is only speaking from my own experience, but the ability to change even the tiny detail of a document easilly and quickly makes it worth-while.<br />
That is, rewording a sentense doesn&#8217;t involve re-writing or re-typing (in the case of typewriters) the entire page, only to find another mistake, or area for improvement</p>
<p>This approch also allows changes to be easilly made at some point in the future, when the author might have new ideas (eg, say they&#8217;re writing a novel, are half-way through and get stuck. Later they come back with a different idea for the plot, and are able to change a few pages to move the plot in the new direction)</p>
<p>This effect is much more profound when wanting to make small changes to many pages (on paper you, of course, would have to rewrite each page in question)</p>
<p>Good usability design is always part of the process of a true professional, as is constant revision of what has been produced so far. To that end, I at least go through many revisions of a text before i consider it &#8220;finished&#8221;.<br />
Word processing allows this to happen much quicker, and far more easilly.</p>
<p>So from my point of view, with regard to improved typography and usability of content, word processing is a good thing, which improves the quality of text which would otherwise suffer if trully done &#8220;by hand&#8221; directly on paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
