say something

Improving the list article format (galleries too)

Needle In a Haystack

So we know there’s a backlash of the list article format going on. And we know that the general cure to the “disease” is to go for quality, not quanity. Discussions instead of a bombardment of links and screen grabs. Though of course, that’s debatable since if I’m a designer looking for these resources in the first place, I’d find them indispensable anyway.

The thing is though, if I am looking for that perfectly tiled background pattern or that brilliant CSS3 button tutorial, how do I scour through oodles of these lists to find exactly what I need? How would I know from my list of bookmarks or starred Google Reader items that the blog post titled “50+ Fresh CSS Techniques, Tutorials and Resources” is the one I need, and not “5 Useful Coding Solutions For Designers And Developers”? These titles are super vague and because the posts are super long, it’s now finding a needle in a haystack.

List article authors need to raise the stakes and add more useful features. A table of contents, for example, that summarizes all the items in the list. Tags too, that should describe the article with keywords as specific as possible.

Perhaps someone can even create an aggregator of these lists, with proper categorization and search. It could even be—gasp—the next “CSS gallery”.

Why fan the flames and tolerate list articles? Again, I know what they’re useful for. They’re a convenient way to check up on what’s new in the design blogosphere, and you can never have too many resources. They’re certainly taking up space for thought-provoking discussions, but the demand is high and we need them too. We might as well rally to improve the format instead of banish it.

The same goes for CSS galleries and image bookmarking sites. I welcome the large amount of sites because sometimes you can never have enough. But how I browse through and experience their content can definitely be improved.

I’m not just talking about aesthetics or readability here. I’m talking about what can be considered new forms of content with sub-content that can describe and classify them:

  • the list article as a type of resource list that contains different downloadable files (e.g., brushes, vectors, photos), tutorials, screenshots, etc.
  • the CSS gallery as a type of website list that contains different websites classified according to style, site type, color, CMS, topic, number of pages, designer, etc.
  • the image bookmarking site as a type of image list that contains different images classified according to style, image type, color, resolution, designer, etc.

Is it possible to create new content formats for these? People have managed to do so many things with Twitter tweets, and Microformats are moving forward at a steady pace, so why not see if we can remix and mashup larger types of content, like ones contained in blog posts?

One of the biggest problems on the Web is that we’re marking things up on such a low level, while tapping into XML structures isn’t as easy to do yet. But imagine if we can make all these resources so much more organized and findable. Maybe people wouldn’t need to complain about list articles and CSS galleries as cliches then.

Related reading:

5 people says things!

  1. I think that trying to improve the lists themselves and creating a new more coherent way of classifying the content in lists is a great idea one that I was attempting to brainstorm the other day.

    Would creating a “CSS gallery” style site that categorizes and sub-categorizes the content of list posts really help quell the amount of those styles of posts and open the door for more discussion centered posts though? That’s the question I’m struggling with because from what I understand from those who are fed up with lists is that they want discussion over lists. Perhaps, if the gallery style site is heavy on quality it would be able to weed out the copycats and marketers just looking for site traffic and a payout thus upping the quality of the lists and lessening the backlash against them. It’s an interesting idea and one that could possibly take a small team of bloggers and designer to get running really well.

    By Eric on December 3, 2009 10:21 pm

  2. I mentioned the “CSS gallery” style site as a quick fix, and it could definitely be the next step to aggregate all the lists out there, but I wish people like Dave Winer (one can dream, right) can initiate the discussion on something even more fundamental, and that’s reformatting content types on the Web such as blog posts so that it’s easy to extract, manage, search information from them. We have something like that in RSS, in tweets, etc.

    Either way, there has to be a way to handle all the information in them, whether or not people agree that more discussion posts should be written instead of lists.

    By Sophia Lucero on December 3, 2009 11:52 pm

  3. [...] I’m still in a “standardize everything” mood, or envy this new doodad since I’m now using Chrome as my default browser, but [...]

    By Mozilla Jetpack: jQuery-esque Firefox add-on development | Wisdump on December 8, 2009 6:28 pm

  4. [...] this article made me realize this could actually be a way to create better list articles. Instead of cramming everything in and bombarding your readers with one long, heavy post, create a [...]

    By Design & development advent calendars for the holidays! | Wisdump on December 14, 2009 5:40 pm

  5. [...] also from Smashing Magazine. It’s like my feed reader was trying to tell me something: yes, a list article can bring an interesting discussion if you’ll just let [...]

    By Designers, do you use someone else’s design on your sites? | Wisdump on February 24, 2010 2:28 am

  6. Subscribe to comments via RSS!

    What do you think?