<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers Revisited: Bloglines and Technorati</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni Ghirardi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I perdenti nellâ€™era del Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5893</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni Ghirardi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I perdenti nellâ€™era del Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5893</guid>
		<description>[...] Make sure to checkout Bloglines Revisited. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Make sure to checkout Bloglines Revisited. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaumeb</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaumeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>I am a long time Bloglines user and it certainly is not a loser. I wish Google or yahoo had bought it. They made a HUGE mistake by not buying it. Bloglines is a full winner for the simple reason that there is absolutly no viable competitor. Google Reader really sucks. Firefox Live Bookmarks can be set up with Bloglines and both combines are awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a long time Bloglines user and it certainly is not a loser. I wish Google or yahoo had bought it. They made a HUGE mistake by not buying it. Bloglines is a full winner for the simple reason that there is absolutly no viable competitor. Google Reader really sucks. Firefox Live Bookmarks can be set up with Bloglines and both combines are awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here&#8217;s what I would do to make Bloglines 2.0 at internetfamous.net</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>Here&#8217;s what I would do to make Bloglines 2.0 at internetfamous.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>[...] Have you read wisdump&#8217;s article on Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers Revisited: Bloglines and Technorati? I have to agree with wisdump that Bloglines have not been keeping up with user&#8217;s needs, and their services offering will no longer meeting the ever changing user&#8217;s needs and likes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Have you read wisdump&#8217;s article on Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers Revisited: Bloglines and Technorati? I have to agree with wisdump that Bloglines have not been keeping up with user&#8217;s needs, and their services offering will no longer meeting the ever changing user&#8217;s needs and likes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanny O'Haley</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5890</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanny O'Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5890</guid>
		<description>I use Bloglines almost every day. I really like the mobile version. It is fast works well and has had been improved over the last year.

I&#039;ll have to agree with you on the look of the &quot;full&quot; site though, it could use the services of a good designer. However, it works and it&#039;s available for me on my Treo and home and work computers without having to load extra software or worry about synchronization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Bloglines almost every day. I really like the mobile version. It is fast works well and has had been improved over the last year.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to agree with you on the look of the &#8220;full&#8221; site though, it could use the services of a good designer. However, it works and it&#8217;s available for me on my Treo and home and work computers without having to load extra software or worry about synchronization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdverseE</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>AdverseE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with you more about Bloglines. Although I continue to use Bloglines as my daily feedreader, I have searched the Internet from top to bottom for a suitable replacement more than once. This is an occurence that should warn Bloglines that maybe they should start improving the site. Someday, some company will realize what features, look and appeal are needed to takeover the web-based feed reader throne, and when they do, I guarantee that Bloglines, as it is today, will see a mass exodus. I hope Mark Fletcher takes notice of your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more about Bloglines. Although I continue to use Bloglines as my daily feedreader, I have searched the Internet from top to bottom for a suitable replacement more than once. This is an occurence that should warn Bloglines that maybe they should start improving the site. Someday, some company will realize what features, look and appeal are needed to takeover the web-based feed reader throne, and when they do, I guarantee that Bloglines, as it is today, will see a mass exodus. I hope Mark Fletcher takes notice of your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been pretty disappointed with bloglines too, for quite a while. They&#039;ve been happy trudging along with their old school app, oblivious to the &quot;Web 2.0&quot; links people are following day-in and day-out when using bloglines.

I remember at SXSW 2006 there was a panel on RSS: Not Just For Blogs Anymore. On the panel was some marketing person from bloglines, and I was bitching and moaning about how bloglines is hard to use and never improved (UI-wise). I think the people around me thought I was some crazy dude bitching about the silliest things. I&#039;m glad to hear I&#039;m not the only one.

There is really only one thing keeping me with bloglines: mark all as read. Google Reader, wtf? People have been bitching about that for nearly a year now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been pretty disappointed with bloglines too, for quite a while. They&#8217;ve been happy trudging along with their old school app, oblivious to the &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; links people are following day-in and day-out when using bloglines.</p>
<p>I remember at SXSW 2006 there was a panel on RSS: Not Just For Blogs Anymore. On the panel was some marketing person from bloglines, and I was bitching and moaning about how bloglines is hard to use and never improved (UI-wise). I think the people around me thought I was some crazy dude bitching about the silliest things. I&#8217;m glad to hear I&#8217;m not the only one.</p>
<p>There is really only one thing keeping me with bloglines: mark all as read. Google Reader, wtf? People have been bitching about that for nearly a year now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidar Hokstad</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5887</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidar Hokstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5887</guid>
		<description>I use Technorati quite a bit, and the difference between Technorati and Google is 1) the tagging - I get info about a subject rather than something that have happened to include the same word, and 2) ordering - if I follow a subject, I want to know what is _new_ and what people talk about, not what people wrote a reference page about five years ago. 

Different applications entirely. Whether Technorati can get people to see the difference is an open question, but they only need a fraction of Google&#039;s traffic to be able to sustain a fairly good sized organization.

On another note: I work at Edgeio. Thanks for the 5K+ visitors your link to Edgeio in the last post brought so far, btw. ;) Obviously I think you completely missed the plot about us. In particular, those Chinese listings aren&#039;t spam, but well, Chinese listings. Spam has been an extremely small problem for us so far. 

If you want local listings, then set your location. The geography widget is there for a reason. And a Chinese site is right around the corner. 

As for people posting listings on their blogs, they do, but where did you get the idea that it&#039;s the only (or even the biggest) source of listings for us? In fact the vast majority of listings come from professionals, for many of whom the tiny effort to get data into Edgeio by turning it into feeds is already paying off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Technorati quite a bit, and the difference between Technorati and Google is 1) the tagging &#8211; I get info about a subject rather than something that have happened to include the same word, and 2) ordering &#8211; if I follow a subject, I want to know what is _new_ and what people talk about, not what people wrote a reference page about five years ago. </p>
<p>Different applications entirely. Whether Technorati can get people to see the difference is an open question, but they only need a fraction of Google&#8217;s traffic to be able to sustain a fairly good sized organization.</p>
<p>On another note: I work at Edgeio. Thanks for the 5K+ visitors your link to Edgeio in the last post brought so far, btw. ;) Obviously I think you completely missed the plot about us. In particular, those Chinese listings aren&#8217;t spam, but well, Chinese listings. Spam has been an extremely small problem for us so far. </p>
<p>If you want local listings, then set your location. The geography widget is there for a reason. And a Chinese site is right around the corner. </p>
<p>As for people posting listings on their blogs, they do, but where did you get the idea that it&#8217;s the only (or even the biggest) source of listings for us? In fact the vast majority of listings come from professionals, for many of whom the tiny effort to get data into Edgeio by turning it into feeds is already paying off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmaonline</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5886</link>
		<dc:creator>jmaonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5886</guid>
		<description>I agree with your Scrives. Netvibes is a million times better than Bloglines. The whole web based desktop is gaining popularity and Netvibes are one of the best I&#039;ve seen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your Scrives. Netvibes is a million times better than Bloglines. The whole web based desktop is gaining popularity and Netvibes are one of the best I&#8217;ve seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauldwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5885</link>
		<dc:creator>pauldwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5885</guid>
		<description>Crikey.

&gt; &quot;Look at Apple and itâ€™s iPod dominance... that hasnâ€™t stopped them from pushing the device to its limits which has only kept its marketshare high.&quot;

Seriously? I don&#039;t think limited photo, video and games capabilities constitute a great return for 5 years worth of &quot;pushing the device to its limits&quot;. It&#039;s pretty much exactly what it is when it launched: 1,000 songs in your pocket. Yes, it&#039;s now more songs, and yes, your pocket is now lighter (and your wallet a little fatter), but Apple certainly haven&#039;t had to innovate. It&#039;s just no-one else has made anything good enough to force them to innovate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey.</p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;Look at Apple and itâ€™s iPod dominance&#8230; that hasnâ€™t stopped them from pushing the device to its limits which has only kept its marketshare high.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously? I don&#8217;t think limited photo, video and games capabilities constitute a great return for 5 years worth of &#8220;pushing the device to its limits&#8221;. It&#8217;s pretty much exactly what it is when it launched: 1,000 songs in your pocket. Yes, it&#8217;s now more songs, and yes, your pocket is now lighter (and your wallet a little fatter), but Apple certainly haven&#8217;t had to innovate. It&#8217;s just no-one else has made anything good enough to force them to innovate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers-revisited-bloglines-and-technorati/comment-page-1/#comment-5884</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=247#comment-5884</guid>
		<description>I would agree that no doubt there are usability improvements that can be made to Bloglines (like just about anything) - although I would be hard pressed to come up with anything significant.

As a regular user of Bloglines I treat it as more of a quick stop than an experience - see what&#039;s new, take a quick look to see if there&#039;s anything worth reading, and then move on. 

So, in that respect, maybe it is *more* like Google than you think. To your point, what sort of &#039;experience&#039; you would like to create for Bloglines users?

I&#039;d also be careful about dismissing Google so out of hand. Just because something looks simple doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that it is - especially when it comes to laying out the search results pages.

I actually have a great deal of respect for how Google has maintained the simplicity of its home page. From my experience running the web site and intranet for a large(ish) organization, I know the pressures that can be put on you to keep adding stuff to the home page without consideration for what will be useful to users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that no doubt there are usability improvements that can be made to Bloglines (like just about anything) &#8211; although I would be hard pressed to come up with anything significant.</p>
<p>As a regular user of Bloglines I treat it as more of a quick stop than an experience &#8211; see what&#8217;s new, take a quick look to see if there&#8217;s anything worth reading, and then move on. </p>
<p>So, in that respect, maybe it is *more* like Google than you think. To your point, what sort of &#8216;experience&#8217; you would like to create for Bloglines users?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be careful about dismissing Google so out of hand. Just because something looks simple doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that it is &#8211; especially when it comes to laying out the search results pages.</p>
<p>I actually have a great deal of respect for how Google has maintained the simplicity of its home page. From my experience running the web site and intranet for a large(ish) organization, I know the pressures that can be put on you to keep adding stuff to the home page without consideration for what will be useful to users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
