<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=top-10-web-20-losers</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dotcoma &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 perdenti duepuntozero</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-333189</link>
		<dc:creator>dotcoma &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 perdenti duepuntozero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-333189</guid>
		<description>[...] questa lista dei losers : si fanno nomi e cognomi, e che nomi e [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] questa lista dei losers : si fanno nomi e cognomi, e che nomi e [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario de Judicibus</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-188658</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario de Judicibus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-188658</guid>
		<description>In my personal opinion web 2.0 sites should be rated on the value they provide, not on the number of people they involve. Why? Read Galaxy Zoo [http://lindipendente.splinder.com/post/18037069/Galaxy+Zoo].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my personal opinion web 2.0 sites should be rated on the value they provide, not on the number of people they involve. Why? Read Galaxy Zoo [http://lindipendente.splinder.com/post/18037069/Galaxy+Zoo].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers &#124; Easy Place To Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-167329</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers &#124; Easy Place To Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-167329</guid>
		<description>[...] Scrivens&#8217; top 10 so-called Web 2.0 failuresread more &#124; digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scrivens&#8217; top 10 so-called Web 2.0 failuresread more | digg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trademark registration</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-131459</link>
		<dc:creator>trademark registration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-131459</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that Technorati is a loser.  Does anyone even go there anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that Technorati is a loser.  Does anyone even go there anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-124436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-124436</guid>
		<description>I personally enjoy using squidoo.  I find it to be user friendly and a great place for search engine traffic.  Is it being used to spam?  Sure, but most everything is these days.  Like most things though, the creme will rise to the top.

Those who give good and unique content will win time and time again.

So, web 2.0&#039;ers, contribute the good stuff and keep web 2.o alive.

Home Business Mentor,

Jeremy Henderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally enjoy using squidoo.  I find it to be user friendly and a great place for search engine traffic.  Is it being used to spam?  Sure, but most everything is these days.  Like most things though, the creme will rise to the top.</p>
<p>Those who give good and unique content will win time and time again.</p>
<p>So, web 2.0&#8242;ers, contribute the good stuff and keep web 2.o alive.</p>
<p>Home Business Mentor,</p>
<p>Jeremy Henderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Die Top 10 Liste der Top 10 Listen &#187; Blogrolle.net</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator>Die Top 10 Liste der Top 10 Listen &#187; Blogrolle.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-9070</guid>
		<description>[...] von 1784 Benutzern 6) Top 10 Cool Sites We Miss 7) Top 15 free SQL Injection Scanners 8) Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers 9) Top 10 Free Time Wasting Sites on the Net 10) Top 10 Accidential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] von 1784 Benutzern 6) Top 10 Cool Sites We Miss 7) Top 15 free SQL Injection Scanners 8) Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers 9) Top 10 Free Time Wasting Sites on the Net 10) Top 10 Accidential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisdump&#8217;s Top 10 of Web 2.0 Losers - Right, or Wrong?</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-5825</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisdump&#8217;s Top 10 of Web 2.0 Losers - Right, or Wrong?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-5825</guid>
		<description>[...] Look over the list for yourself to see if you&#8217;re allied or opposed to some selections or the complete set. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Look over the list for yourself to see if you&rsquo;re allied or opposed to some selections or the complete set. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lists</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-5824</link>
		<dc:creator>lists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 05:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-5824</guid>
		<description>I cann&#039;t agree thant Technorati is a loser, Technorati meets the need of so many and more and more bloggers. Until today, it is the best blog aggregation site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cann&#8217;t agree thant Technorati is a loser, Technorati meets the need of so many and more and more bloggers. Until today, it is the best blog aggregation site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woo..World Top 33 of the Top 10 &#171; sharing everything</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-5823</link>
		<dc:creator>Woo..World Top 33 of the Top 10 &#171; sharing everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-5823</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers &#171; News Coctail</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/comment-page-3/#comment-5822</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Web 2.0 Losers &#171; News Coctail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/top-10-web-20-losers/#comment-5822</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 10 Web 2.0&#160;Losers Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; recar @ 1:54 pm   Source  Last week, Michael Calore, posted his take on Web 2.0 Winners and Losers and while I agreed with some of his picks, there were a lot that I didnâ€™t think belonged. I also wanted to go a bit more indepth as to why these sites have made the list. With that in mind I have put together my list of 10 Web 2.0 losers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 Web 2.0&nbsp;Losers Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; recar @ 1:54 pm   Source  Last week, Michael Calore, posted his take on Web 2.0 Winners and Losers and while I agreed with some of his picks, there were a lot that I didnâ€™t think belonged. I also wanted to go a bit more indepth as to why these sites have made the list. With that in mind I have put together my list of 10 Web 2.0 losers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
