<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Is The Google Web Browser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=where-is-the-google-web-browser</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-118385</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/#comment-118385</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re poring money into FF, have influence over it, and use it as a benchmark for their web products.  Why would they ever develop their own browser.  It costs them little to get an already established, proven product, that has brand recognition.  I don&#039;t see the Google Browser happening unless Google buys it outright and re-brands it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re poring money into FF, have influence over it, and use it as a benchmark for their web products.  Why would they ever develop their own browser.  It costs them little to get an already established, proven product, that has brand recognition.  I don&#8217;t see the Google Browser happening unless Google buys it outright and re-brands it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron T</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-118334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/#comment-118334</guid>
		<description>Seriously speaking, I don&#039;t believed that Big Ole Google will ever release a Google-branded browser simply because Good Ole Microsoft has so much issues on it&#039;s hands with IE. Influencing the web community is where Google is heading towards I say. But good article, provides an alternative thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously speaking, I don&#8217;t believed that Big Ole Google will ever release a Google-branded browser simply because Good Ole Microsoft has so much issues on it&#8217;s hands with IE. Influencing the web community is where Google is heading towards I say. But good article, provides an alternative thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-118308</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/web/where-is-the-google-web-browser/#comment-118308</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Webkit more standards compliant than Gecko?  I know when I was working with XSLT last year the two Windows browsers that best implemented the styles were Opera and Safari.  Safari/Webkit is faster on my two Windows machines as well.

If Google has to adopt a browser, I would rather it worked to make Webkit as extensible as FF/Gecko rather than just pour money into the Mozilla Foundation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Webkit more standards compliant than Gecko?  I know when I was working with XSLT last year the two Windows browsers that best implemented the styles were Opera and Safari.  Safari/Webkit is faster on my two Windows machines as well.</p>
<p>If Google has to adopt a browser, I would rather it worked to make Webkit as extensible as FF/Gecko rather than just pour money into the Mozilla Foundation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
