<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benefits of Removing &#8216;www&#8217; From Your URL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url</link>
	<description>Dumping wisdom on the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baney Design: Websites &#38; Branding &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trouble with 3 Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-253933</link>
		<dc:creator>Baney Design: Websites &#38; Branding &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trouble with 3 Letters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-253933</guid>
		<description>[...] wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inseasonout : Making things beautiful &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking the WWW out of the web</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>Inseasonout : Making things beautiful &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking the WWW out of the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>[...] Many thanks to Paul Scrivs of Wisdump and 9rules for his recent article outlining the reasons for removing the www from your site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many thanks to Paul Scrivs of Wisdump and 9rules for his recent article outlining the reasons for removing the www from your site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On UX &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Usability of the &#8216;www&#8217; in a URL</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator>On UX &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Usability of the &#8216;www&#8217; in a URL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4798</guid>
		<description>[...] I was recently cleaning up my RSS reader when I came across this article by Scrivs on the benifits of removing the www from your url from a few months ago. The idea that the http://no-www.org/ has been arround for a while (since at least 2003), but I don&#8217;t totally agree. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was recently cleaning up my RSS reader when I came across this article by Scrivs on the benifits of removing the www from your url from a few months ago. The idea that the <a href="http://no-www.org/" rel="nofollow">http://no-www.org/</a> has been arround for a while (since at least 2003), but I don&#8217;t totally agree. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 18:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>Even I don&#039;t have a &quot;WWW&quot;. To be frank, I never noticed it until recently though I have been blogging for over 8 months now. 


Getting this code on my .htaccess and work with WP is a big headache. After reading this article, I&#039;m happy. :D 

I still don&#039;t get what&#039;s right. Should I do something to get the &quot;www&quot; redirect on or leave it as it is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even I don&#8217;t have a &#8220;WWW&#8221;. To be frank, I never noticed it until recently though I have been blogging for over 8 months now. </p>
<p>Getting this code on my .htaccess and work with WP is a big headache. After reading this article, I&#8217;m happy. :D </p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t get what&#8217;s right. Should I do something to get the &#8220;www&#8221; redirect on or leave it as it is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4796</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4796</guid>
		<description>Are you all crazy? 

Obviously this is what you get when you something becomes popular. Back to basics, the &quot;com&quot;, &quot;net&quot;, &quot;org&quot; at the end of a DOMAINNAME is call the root domain. The Next part is what you rent from Domain name authorities. That is considered the domain. The next element in a properly format URL is the host name. In this case the &quot;WWW&quot;. That is how DNS works. Hate to shock you all but we use to use &quot;gopher&quot;, &quot;news&quot;, &quot;mail&quot;, and a whole bunch more standard names for host all over our networks which were primarily dedicated to those tasks. Amazing how that works, HUH? Imagine we actually use to do things right back in the beginning before some lazy Late comers decided the Internet was here to server the solely the web....

Just because some people are lazy, and DNS administrators feel they need to cater to these people, does not mean any professional person who claims to be a &quot;web developer&quot;, &quot;web designer&quot; or any other designation with web or Internet centric names should show their lack of professionalism, experience, and grasp of the most basic technology of what makes the Internet, by pushing or endorsing something that is nothing more than a hack. If anything you should be pushing to put the www back into the domain names, because that is the proper use of DNS. You are equating web service with the domain name, not with a host or service aliase designation, as it should be. 

If you are going to developed on the Internet at least take the time to understand the Internet. There were things before the web browser, the Internet was not and is not only there for html and WWW. By original design, there should not be a machine or record for the base domain name. It is just their as network classification, not a machine classification. Everything should be A host record under a domain name, or an aliases to another host record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you all crazy? </p>
<p>Obviously this is what you get when you something becomes popular. Back to basics, the &#8220;com&#8221;, &#8220;net&#8221;, &#8220;org&#8221; at the end of a DOMAINNAME is call the root domain. The Next part is what you rent from Domain name authorities. That is considered the domain. The next element in a properly format URL is the host name. In this case the &#8220;WWW&#8221;. That is how DNS works. Hate to shock you all but we use to use &#8220;gopher&#8221;, &#8220;news&#8221;, &#8220;mail&#8221;, and a whole bunch more standard names for host all over our networks which were primarily dedicated to those tasks. Amazing how that works, HUH? Imagine we actually use to do things right back in the beginning before some lazy Late comers decided the Internet was here to server the solely the web&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just because some people are lazy, and DNS administrators feel they need to cater to these people, does not mean any professional person who claims to be a &#8220;web developer&#8221;, &#8220;web designer&#8221; or any other designation with web or Internet centric names should show their lack of professionalism, experience, and grasp of the most basic technology of what makes the Internet, by pushing or endorsing something that is nothing more than a hack. If anything you should be pushing to put the www back into the domain names, because that is the proper use of DNS. You are equating web service with the domain name, not with a host or service aliase designation, as it should be. </p>
<p>If you are going to developed on the Internet at least take the time to understand the Internet. There were things before the web browser, the Internet was not and is not only there for html and WWW. By original design, there should not be a machine or record for the base domain name. It is just their as network classification, not a machine classification. Everything should be A host record under a domain name, or an aliases to another host record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Nutter</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4795</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Nutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4795</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to thank you for this, Gruber&#039;s code broke WordPress when I tried it. I happily stumbled across this after reading Gruber&#039;s post and found that your method is WP friendly.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to thank you for this, Gruber&#8217;s code broke WordPress when I tried it. I happily stumbled across this after reading Gruber&#8217;s post and found that your method is WP friendly.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumantra</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4794</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumantra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4794</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am creating a web site www.mysite.com. Now there I am using wildcards so that my users can use it by their name such as typing myname.mysite.com (e.g. http://john.mysite.com). Now on the first page I am extracting the user name searching in the database it exists or not. If yes then redirecting that to with his page and if that does not exist then i want to redirect that to www.mysite.com. Now as i have written code in the first page so it has become recursive. Can you suggest how to solve it. Will DNS forwarding can help me here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am creating a web site <a href="http://www.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysite.com</a>. Now there I am using wildcards so that my users can use it by their name such as typing myname.mysite.com (e.g. <a href="http://john.mysite.com)" rel="nofollow">http://john.mysite.com)</a>. Now on the first page I am extracting the user name searching in the database it exists or not. If yes then redirecting that to with his page and if that does not exist then i want to redirect that to <a href="http://www.mysite.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysite.com</a>. Now as i have written code in the first page so it has become recursive. Can you suggest how to solve it. Will DNS forwarding can help me here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog &#187; Demise of The WWW</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Caudill&#8217;s Blog &#187; Demise of The WWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>[...] From the day this site went online it&#8217;s removed the WWW if used, providing a single, optimized URL for all pages. Now that methods to implement such functionality are becoming so simple, I expect it will become even more common as bloggers adopt a single URL model (hopefully the non-WWW form). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From the day this site went online it&rsquo;s removed the WWW if used, providing a single, optimized URL for all pages. Now that methods to implement such functionality are becoming so simple, I expect it will become even more common as bloggers adopt a single URL model (hopefully the non-WWW form). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 08:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>All better, just had to change a setting serverside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All better, just had to change a setting serverside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/comment-page-1/#comment-4791</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 08:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wisdump.com/?p=204#comment-4791</guid>
		<description>Yeah I just moved servers so I am working on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I just moved servers so I am working on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
