Bucking Design Trends

September 08, 2004 | View Comments (18) | Category: Design

Summary: Getting that copycat feeling? Think every site uses the same elements just with different fonts? Time to start bucking those design trends.

From Cameron Moll in June:

  1. Large type to make a big showing.
  2. A quiet death of the ridiculously stupid, long-scrolling homepage.
  3. Fieldset. Need we say more?
  4. The ubiquitous drop-shadow goes horizontal.
  5. Incessant redesigning becomes cessant.

Now not all of these are design trends so really only 1,2 and 4 apply to this entry. I would also like to add diagonal lines to one of those design trends that seems to be very prominent in the websites we create. Hell, I used them on Forever Geek.

In any case does anyone ever see these design trends and initially think how great they look and then after some time get so tired of looking at them everywhere that whenever you do a design you intentionally prevent yourself from using them?

I found that was the case with the 9rules design and I am finding it with the Whitespace redesign (might be adventurous and start releasing it today or tomorrow) as well. However, are we being too selfish in our own designs? Are we simply trying to please ourselves more than we are the clients or their audience?

I don't have either so I have the luxury on mainly focusing on what I like and that has been working just fine with me. However, how do you separate your own design interests from what the client wants and the current design trends?

If used properly we all know that a dropshadow can add another dynamic to a website, but do you ever get that “copycat” feeling when you use them? I am sure it's just an ego thing with me but I try to avoid them now because I know everyone has done them to death and I don't want to be the guy that creates a site that everyone has seen before. I might just be paranoid though.

This just another one of those endless thought type posts that have no ending because design is something that has no answer, but plenty of questions.

Trackback URL: http://9rules.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/328

Comments

#1

"Are we simply trying to please ourselves more than we are the clients or their audience?"

I think that we do try to please ourselves when designing for clients. Our clients have come to us because we have knowledge of what works and what doesn't, and what they need to help them acheive their goal online.

So if we were to put out a design that doesn't please us as well as your clients, then we have really failed at doing our job. Granted, in some cases everyone has put out a design that they were not happy with to satisfy a client who stood firm about one thing or another, but I think those cases are few and far between.

As far as the copycat issue goes, elements that I place in my design are my choice. I use them because I feel they will enhance the design of the site. I can't really be worried about whether it has been used by others or not, because it is more than likely going to have already been done at one point or another.

Jeremy Flint (http://www.jeremyflint.com)

#2

I was thinking the exact same thoughts Jeremy. As designers it is best that we are happy with what we design, but I can see some people being so infatuated with dropshadows (for example) that they add them just to add them because that is what they like.

You should always be happy with your work and therefore that requires putting your interests into the design as well. However, sometimes we get stuck in the circumstance where a client kills a design that leaves us unhappy.

As for the copycat issue, maybe I am thinking more large scale issues as using a dropshadow like someone else might on their whole site along with other elements. Hell, I don't know what I am saying :-)

Scrivs (http://businesslogs.com)

#3

Well, as long as you can back up your decision to use elements like dropshadows, large text, etc., then it becomes less and less of a copycat issue.

When you start doing stuff because "you think its cool and saw someone else do it", then the choice begins to lose credibility.

Jeremy Flint (http://www.jeremyflint.com)

#4

I don't feel guilty about using drop shadows because I pretty much invented the idea anyway. Everyone else copied *me*. Gradients? Yep, that was me too. Oh and diagonal lines. Give me a break. I was using diagonal lines back in the 90s. Nobody liked blue until I started using it!

Really though, who cares if your design is 100% original or not? Just because someone else is using something doesnt mean you shouldnt. Oh damn, that guy is using a 2 column layout. I better go for 3.

I'm not saying don't try to come up with something original, but were does it end?

John Serris (http://phonophunk.phreakin.com/)

#5

I'm definitely already tiring of my most recent redesign of jeffcroft.com, in which I use some of these elements.

The key to doing trends well is doing them in moderation and combining them with basic staples of design that will never go out of style.

Think about it in terms of fashion for a minute. If you sport the latest trends from head to toe, you look ridiculous. But, if you rock a really trendy button down with some classic jeans and loafers, the ladies will swoon. Similarily, if you're going to roll out in your trendiest whiskereed Diesel jeans and Puma sneaks, then you probably better stick to a basic shirt and jacket.

Jeff Croft (http://jeffcroft.com)

#6

I really think you have a point here. Some days ago I just tried to make a design (because I had nothing else to do :-)). But no matter how hard I tried, I couldn't make it look like anything I hadn't already seen. And I think that's one of the consequences of supporting multiple browsers. If *all* browsers rendered the same, then it would be a bit less difficult. You could place elements in crazy ways, but if it looked great in your fav. browser, you wouldn't have to bother about others.

But they don't, and that makes a limit on what we can do. Many sites uses a centered layout, with a fixed value (of course, they differ in some way), because it's possible to make it look the same in most browsers.

I'd really like to make a design with navbar, content, and logo placed with no structure of each other - but I can't, since I have to think of the audience, that might not be able to read it. That is, if I want visitors that stick ;-).

Instance given, Andrei made a redesign some time ago. It didn't look like everything else, but the uniqueness caused troubles in many browsers.

Bottomline, the web is great, but the limits decreases our ability to be unique.

Jonathan Holst (http://holst.biz/)

#7

I totally disagree that the "web decreases our ability to be unique!"

The possibilities are endless! Think of flash!

I think people in general are herd oriented,(designers are no exception which is sad), and do things because they think its now the cool thing to do instead of being original and creative.

Also with the arrival of the blog community - you get community and critique which generally shifts people into a mediocre mass of blah.

I say just have fun and do your own thing!

Fuck design trends!

Check http://www.mjau-mjau.com/classic.html

for a unique site...(not mine)

Almustafa El-Said

#8

I think it's necessary to seperate being unique from following trends.

There's nothing wrong with following a trend. We do it in all aspects of our culture, from the clothes we wear, to the food we eat.

For instance, Paul, you live in Florida. The trend in Florida is to enjoy the beaches (whatever's left of them after these Hurricanes) during the Summer. To not do that seperates you - arguably negatively - as an outsider, or not completely part of that culture.

Look at the web design books you offer on your site. They are the same as all the other blogger / designers. Why? They are the trend in our culture right now. Doesn't have anything to do with our uniqueness as designers.

My children get their life cues (trends) primarily from watching my wife and I interact. If they didn't, I'd probably have some concerns - however, they're completely unique individuals.

Mark (http://www.lightpierce.com/ltshdw)

#9

On the subject of bucking design trends - congratulations Paul on your new design here. Very clean, elegant even. I'm impressed.

Jonathan M. Hollin (http://blog.urbanmainframe.com/)

#10

Shhh, let's save that for the next entry. Thanks though.

Mark, I don't think there is anything wrong with following trends, I was more curious of how designers who tire of those trends handle themselves. Do you just go about trying actively to avoid them or do you continue to go along with the flow?

Scrivs (http://businesslogs.com)

#11

You said flash like it's a great thing:) And don't get me wrong, I love using it, but let's not talk about the endless possibilities of flash, when we know it's disabilities. In that, calling designers herd oriented, while mostly true, also fits you in the category of the free-your-mind-and-spirit-kool design.

I don't know, I see the trends in everything, it's hard to steer clear as POP culture shifts our imagery -- I find a majority of sites carry the similar look -- but this is the same of print design and art history has shown for years. You have a select few who break the mold, and you have a large group that plays catch up until someone else breaks the mold. I remember a few years when grayscale was out and halftone dot imagery was in -- still is for some things.

I also see a lot more photoshop file > image > adjustment > threshold going on with imagery and that's getting old too (the cartoon look).

What I find most confusing is what is a trend, and what is a standard? Some things must be kept similar for the ease of average users -- if you want hits then you need intelligient layout, structure and navigation. While left menus aren't a trend, but a standard, are the little icons by them a trend? Horizontal headers? These similar elements used by designers keep our customers comfortable when playing on our work. That type of stuff keeps me awake at night:)

And the drop shadows -- those can't be a trend, their just becoming popular in every medium now -- I had an Art Director tell me once "if your client doesn't like that logo, pop a drop shadow on it and show it to them again. They'll probably love it." Need I say more:)?

So I would say that trends will always ride in corporate design -- unless your working for Nike, you are a company designer making your client and their consumers content, and you'll get 'I love those horizontal drop shadows...' because they and their users are comfortable with it. But for you personal stuff, well, you should try as hard as you can to rock the vote and push yourself. Learn print design if you know web, learn web if you know print, take some art history classes or buy some books -- it may be a different medium, but I garauntee you'll see similar mistakes and similar trends and you'll find yourself wondering why you ever thought in 2-D:)

Brady J. Frey (http://www.dotfive.com)

#12

I just saw that last comment by you scrivs:) I try to balance new methods from what I feel looks and acts right (from a designers look) but push a little here and there. But, again, that depends on the client and audience -- if it's my personal work, I'm going to try and break trends by doing what I think looks cool, works, and feels like me. If it's for a clothing company of over 40 midwest housewives (sorry mom), well, they ain't gettin' no wrecked look, they'll probably get a comfortable pastel hue layout that is simple to navigate, large in graphics and text, fast to use with lots of fast information, and everything will flex comfortably for smaller screen. Largely I would try as hard as I can to steer away from a trend on that one, or else it will be out of date quickly, like funky tee's come and go, but black sweaters never go away.

Brady J. Frey (http://www.dotfive.com)

#13

I think, as I think Brady alluded to with the clothing store example, you really have all kinds of trends to follow. You have design trends, industry trends, client trends, customer trends...

Whose trend are you going to break?

I understand your point, however. Here's how I'd look at it. Wherever you see a trend, it's typically something found in a group of like-minded individuals - a team, or community if you will. Far better - I believe - to push the envelope a bit and coerce the team / community / industry / social group into a new way of thinking, rather than come in and bust everything up just in the name of change.

I've been in a couple of situations where someone came into an environment to shake things up a bit - usually it didn't work out, and said person found themselves on the outside looking in.

Having said that however, I think shaking things up a bit is a good thing in some situations. However, to pull it off, you have to have a high level of trust and leadership capacity within the environment.

Mark (http://www.lightpierce.com/ltshdw)

#14

Having said that however, I think shaking things up a bit is a good thing in some situations. However, to pull it off, you have to have a high level of trust and leadership capacity within the environment.

Nail. Head.

Scrivs (http://businesslogs.com)

#15

A few more:
6. Links, when hovered will change the bg of the text, but won't have any padding around them.
7. *The greatest and latest* entry on blogs are almost hidden. (When Stopdesign first went 3-coll, but the latest article is more prominent now)

P.S. The new front page design is really nice scrivs, _but_ (:P) two things:

#centercoll should have it's top defined in ems. To see why, just increase text-size.

Could the latest (and greatest, yadayada) article be more prominent, say, like stopdesign has it.

For the rest I'm just glad that I still have room to innovate the frontpage design for my own blog (in the works, after other projects get finished) Also, an article in which you share your path of thinking when coming up with this new design would be appreciated.

AkaXakA (http://akaxaka.gameover.com)

#16

Uhoh, you want me to explore ems? Hehe, I think I can do that.

Prominent article, yeah I figured someone would ask for that. I have some ideas for it.

And I can write a more detailed article as to the approach for this design.

Scrivs (http://businesslogs.com)

#17

I don't think it's so much that we get sick of seeing these ubiquitous little design elements, but more that we get *accustomed* to them. They are the "safe" route to go when working on a design's visual appeal. Traveling off of this road can be uncomfortable and doesn't always yield attractive results, so designers tend to stick with the tried-and-true.

In the long run, it's just a matter of time. It's like evolution. Current human biology seems to work pretty damn well, and thus we keep generating the same sort of thing through reproduction. But each new person has a few small genetic changes that make them unique; they may look like their parents, but they still have a special blend that nobody else has. Eventually down the line, things are looking very different.

I can't believe I just made an analogy out of that. It's not perfect, but it gets the point across I think. Basically, as long as a designer puts his or her heart into each work, design trends aren't harmful; something very tiny and unique will always come out, and it will eventually lead to greater things.

Gist of this post: we will never stop coming up with the next design trend, even if we stick somewhat to the current ones.

Chris Vincent (http://dris.dyndns.org:8080/)

#18

The latest fads are becoming boring with a relentless ferocity these days. My big worry is that the fashions will start to go the same way as music and clothing, reproducing themselves on a regular basis. How long till the fashing text and annoying animated gifs of yesteryear resurface as the next fad? Could the Punk movement be echoed by an anti-fashion exposion of table based designs? Look around your local high street and you'll see fashions galore from the 70s and 80s.
Eris has a post with a fun redesign on it that I dubbed the 'wicked splattered look' for fun. Are ideas now so hard to come by that we must resort to copying Granny? Will the next big thing be the 'Amish look'?

Gawd help us all.........

Adrian Rinehart-Balfe (http://www.boogenstein.com/)

Keep track of comments to all entries with the Comments Feed