The Pre-Launch Success Plan

October 11, 2004 | View Comments (8) | Category: Web Mastering

Summary: There are certain things that should be in place before your site launches to ensure that your path to success is smoother than if you just launched with a "Welcome here" message and a default template.

There have been many times on this site and on others where the criteria for building a successful blog have been discussed, but I have never gone over what it takes to make a successful site/blog before it launches. I would advise myself to follow these guidelines since I get a bit overzealous with every launch and always seem to launch a bit too early.

The Design

Not surprisingly the design of your site is what gives the visitor their first impression of what to expect. Silly me has taken the lazy route as of late and pretty much tried to make all my new sites ugly as possible. If you visit most of them now you will see that they have the same general design just so the reader doesn't get too sick of looking at them. With regards to Bet Fest a little more time was invested in the design and it has paid off tremendously. I have received numerous emails from people who are interested in Poker and are intrigued by the site and in every email they mention how much they like the design. Design goes a long way in leaving that first impression.

Last week, Nick Denton launched three new sites in his Gawker Media empire and to say the least the sites are horrendous. I am always interested to look at and read new sites, but for Jalopnik I can't even stay for more than a few seconds because the design just turns me away. What's the use of great content if your design chases everyone away? At the very least make sure to stay away from using the default templates that come with your blogging package and avoid over-designing the site as seems to be the case with the new Gawker sites.

In contrast, you have Mighty Goods that was designed by Bowman. I can't say I have that much interest in this site, but the design definitely kept me there longer than the Gawker sites and made me want to at least read the content.

My goal was to go back to a basic (heh, extremely basic) design for all the sites that was readable to the visitor and then I can begin to improve upon each individial one that will help make them distinct. It's like I created 9 new coloring books to play with.

Over at Binary Thoughts they discuss Blog Design & Subscriber Base and ask an interesting question if we have become so fascinated by the design of a site that we have disregarded the content that it possesses. I think it's more along the lines of if you have a design blog and it is well-designed and looks “pretty” then this instantly builds credibility for yourself. On the other hand if you deplore a design like my own with very little use of images and color then the initial impression of the first-time visitor is that my credibility isn't as high as the next guy who has a better looking design. Notice how all of this occurs even before they read the content.

The Content

Over at Business Logs I wrote about pre-launch content and how important it is to a site. In this community you see too many people announcing the launch of their sites and the only content that can be found is a “Welcome to my site” type entry. People bookmark sites with great content. People add sites to their RSS feeds with great content. Not too many people can remember a site with one entry welcoming them.

Try to have at least 4-5 quality entries on your site so at the very least visitors have something to explore and are given a better idea of what to expect in the future from you.

What is it?

Initially when you launch, I think it is a good idea to have a visible description of what your site is about. It's probably better to always have description of what your site is about on the homepage, but over time some people choose to discard it and put it on the homepage.

After your visitors get passed the design of your site they are going to wonder what it is about. If they can't find it or have to search too hard for it they may just leave especially if all you have is one entry. Let them know where they are and why they should be there.

The Review

When it's almost time to launch a site it is easy to get so excited that you launch it, announce it, and only come to find some major errors when people start visiting it. I should know as I seem to do this with every site I create :-). Before you launch you should ask a couple of people to review the site to help point out anything blatantly wrong or missing that you may have overlooked.

Creating a successful site begins before it launches. You may have a plan in place explaining how the site will grow and become popular over time, but how well you are prepared before the launch can dictate how hard you have to work to acheive your goals for the site.

With all of that said I see a million things that need to improve on all of my sites. Both a gift and a curse for writing these kinds of entries I guess.

Trackback URL: http://9rules.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/359

Comments

#1

On the other hand if you deplore a design like my own with very little use of images and color then the initial impression of the first-time visitor is that my credibility isn't as high as the next guy who has a better looking design.

One way or another, the content is probably what brings visitors to this site -- either you came up in a search, or someone linked to you because of your content.

Anyone who looks at the content here should quickly realize that Whitespace isn't a blog about graphic design.

Would this post, for example, belong on a graphic design blog?

(For the record, I wish I could come up with a site design that is as clean as yours.)

Robert

#2

Good point Robert. Guess I need to talk more about design and in fact this entry started off as one concerning design and its effects on stickiness for a website. Guess that didn't work out too well.

Scrivs (http://9rules.com/)

#3

I think the rule of 4-5 entries is a pretty good one to go by, especially in the case of group blogs. Launching with quality content already in place will keep readers from being disappointed and attract a readership that much quicker.

Vinnie Garcia (http://blog.vinniegarcia.com)

#4

I was going through all these troubles with my latest site PosterDome I had to step back and design for my audience who may not have such a keen sense of website design as others in this community. As for the content and the all important search function, They had to be easily seen and accesible. After a few days of just looking at the site and making sure it was right, then I released it.

Anyways, that's my experience, thanks for the article. It is very helpful.

Daniel (http://www.blog.adion44.com)

#5

I'm currently working on my own website, my first one that I plan to run for profit instead of just for myself. This article helped quite a bit, and I will definately keep the tips in mind. Thanks!

Proph3t

#6

To each his own of course. I find that because of your designs I stick around and read content - while other graphically intese sites I tend to disregard in favor of an easier read.

But then again, I bookmark for design, then if the bookmark gets interesting, I subscribe via RSS. It's kind of a vicious circle - too little design makes the user leave, too much design makes them leave. I think you have to find a perfect harmony between the two. Sites like blakems.com, stopdesign.com, and justwatchthesky.com I think are great examples of this perfect 'harmony' of design.

The more and more I stare at my blog, I think about how I could perfect it's visual appearence. I've never gotten a complaint, but I feel it's too damn hard to read the entries. I feel if I had a more open, clean design maybe more people would read more into it. All in all, I just don't know.

Kyle (http://www.warpspire.com/)

#7

Guess I need to talk more about design and in fact this entry started off as one concerning design and its effects on stickiness for a website. Guess that didn't work out too well.

I think it worked out just fine. It isn't pretty pictures that make a site sticky -- content makes a site sticky. As a matter of site design (different from graphic design), you have chosen to feature your content, front and center.

In your case, your graphic design doesn't hurt your credibility -- even though you call your sites "ugly," I'm sure you admit they could be worse.

The web is about communication, not just being pretty. There's more to "design" for the web than graphics and visuals, and I think you do a good job of covering the wide range of web stuff.

Robert

#8

I made a new website (for myself) recently (www.charmingdesign.tk), and I showed to a few people I know (fellow-webdesigners and other critical people). I helped a lot, I got some valuable tips, and its is so great to find a few pople who want to read the content; you can never find your own crappy sentences or spell errors.

So what I am trying to say is: It is good to let your site get rated before lauch, and of course the content should be there.

Niek Kouwenberg (http://www.charmingdesign.tk/)

Keep track of comments to all entries with the Comments Feed

Post a comment










Remember personal info?